ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2019
Expert opinions on the authenticity of moulage in simulation: a Delphi study.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of moulage on learners' experience in simulation-based education and training: systematic review.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Clinical Script for Medicine Dispensing.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- BLEED TIME Simulation Study - Bleeding Limb, Effectiveness and Efficiency in Determining Time to Intervene on Mangled Extremity.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Production and educational value of anatomical megamoulages.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- 'Having skin in the game': guiding principles for incorporating moulage into OSCEs.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- High-Fidelity, Indigenously Prepared, Low-Cost Moulage as a Valid Simulation Tool to Improve Trauma Education.Cureus · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of three-dimensional transfers to depict skin conditions in simulation-based education.GMS journal for medical education · 2024Article
- Perception of Realism and Acquisition of Clinical Skills in Simulated Pediatric Dentistry Scenarios.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Development, production and evaluation of 2-dimensional transfer tattoos to simulate skin conditions in health professions education.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- COVID-SIM: building testing capacity through public engagement with healthcare simulation.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Effect of a health education program on puberty knowledge among visually impaired female adolescent students.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- How does moulage contribute to medical students' perceived engagement in simulation? A mixed-methods pilot study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMoulage is a technique in which special effects makeup is used to create wounds and other effects in simulation to add context and create realism in an otherwise fabricated environment. The degree to which moulage is used in the simulated environment is varied; that is, there is no guide for how authentic it is required to be. To objectively assess whether a higher level of authenticity in moulage influences engagement and better outcomes, a common model to assess authenticity is required. The aim of this study was to explore expert opinions on moulage in simulation and develop an instrument for the classification of moulage in simulation.
methodsThe instrument was developed in 3 phases: expert panellist recruitment, domain identification, and consensus rounds. A Delphi technique was used to explore themes of authenticity using Dieckmann's Theory of Realism as a frame of reference. An initial list of elements was raised by a panel of international experts. The experts participated in a further four rounds of questioning, identifying and then ranking and/or rating elements of authenticity in moulage. A priori consensus threshold was set at 80%.
resultsIn round 1, 18 of 31 invited panellists participated, and a total of 10 completed round 5 (attrition 44%). As a result of the Delphi, the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale was developed. Under the three domains of realism, 60 elements were identified by experts. A total of 13 elements reached the consensus threshold, whilst tensions regarding the necessity for authentic moulage were identified throughout the rounds.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the complexity of moulage in simulation, with particular challenges surrounding the experts' views on authenticity. A prototype instrument for measuring moulage authenticity is presented in the form of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale (MARS) to further aid progress in understanding the role of authentic moulage in simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.