Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Behavior of Four Olive Cultivars During Salt Stress.

Luca Regni, Alberto Marco Del Pino, Soraya Mousavi, Carlo Alberto Palmerini, Luciana Baldoni, Roberto Mariotti, Hanene Mairech, Tiziano Gardi, Roberto D'Amato, Primo Proietti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abiotic Stress in Crop Production.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tolerance Mechanisms of Olive Tree (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luca RegniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alberto Marco Del PinoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Soraya MousaviInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, Perugia, Italy.
Carlo Alberto PalmeriniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Luciana BaldoniInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, Perugia, Italy.
Roberto MariottiInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, Perugia, Italy.
Hanene MairechDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Tiziano GardiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Roberto D'AmatoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Primo ProiettiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olive is considered as a moderately salt tolerant plant, however, tolerance to salt appears to be cultivar-dependent and genotypic responses have not been extensively investigated. In this work, saline stress was induced in four olive cultivars: Arbequina, Koroneiki, Royal de Cazorla and Fadak 86. The plants were grown in 2.5 l pots containing 60% peat and 40% of pumice mixture for 240 days and were irrigated three times a week with half-strength Hoagland solution containing 0, 100 and 200 mM NaCl. The effects of salt stress on growth, physiological and biochemical parameters were determined after 180, 210, and 240 days of treatment. Saline stress response was evaluated in leaves by measuring the activity of GSH and CAT enzymatic activity, as well as proline levels, gas exchanges, leaves relative water content and chlorophyll content, and proline content. All the studied cultivars showed a decrease in Net Photosynthesis, leaves chlorophyll content and plant growth (mainly leaves dry weight) and an increase in the activity of GSH and CAT. In addition, the reduction of proline content in leaf tissues, induced an alteration of osmotic regulation. Among the studied cultivars Royal and Koroneiki better counteracting the effects of saline stress thanks to a higher activity of two antioxidant enzymes.

Indexed as

antioxidant enzymeolivephotosynthesisprolinesalt stress

Identifiers

PMID31333704
PMCPMC6624443
OpenAlexW2950095015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.