Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333596›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Clear Victory for

Hongliang Chen, Yating Wen, Zhongyu Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Inclusion Membrane Proteins ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Infection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  4. Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genes · 2025
    Review
  9. Virulence · 2024
    Review
  10. The Emergence Potential ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2024
    Review
  11. Recognition ofInfection and immunity · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Autophagy: the misty lands ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Molecular pathogenesis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Better In Vitro Tools for ExploringLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. New insights intoFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongliang ChenInstitute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
Yating WenInstitute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
Zhongyu LiInstitute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
University of South China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens, members of the

Indexed as

Chlamydiaimmune recognitioninnate immune cellsinnate immune responsesurvival and growth

Identifiers

PMID31333596
PMCPMC6619438
OpenAlexW2953801814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.