ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Speech Processing Difficulties in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the relationship between auditory processing characteristics and cognition in preschool children with developmental language disorder based on fNIRS.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Neural signatures of stream segregation from childhood to adulthood.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Altered auditory attention and functional connectivity in the auditory cortex of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- The consistency of categorization-consistency in speech perception.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Psychosocial and Audiological Characteristics in Misophonia: An Interdisciplinary Comparison Study of Adults with Misophonia to Healthy Controls.Journal of otology · 2025Article
- The slowest timescales of neural synchronization reveal the strongest influence of auditory distraction.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Home Language Experience Shapes Which Skills Are Used during Unfamiliar Speech Processing.Languages (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Speech-derived haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in a multi-talker background.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Misjudgement of One's Own Performance? Exploring Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder (ADHD) and Individual Difference in Complex Music and Foreign Language Perception.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- [Application of Preschool Auditory Processing Assessment Scale in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023Article
- Compromised word-level neural tracking in the high-gamma band for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Training Programs for Improving Speech Perception in Noise: A Review.Journal of audiology & otology · 2023Review
- The Effect of Age, Type of Noise, and Cochlear Implants on Adaptive Sentence-in-Noise Task.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Editorial: Cognitive hearing science: Investigating the relationship between selective attention and brain activity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The cognitive hearing science perspective on perceiving, understanding, and remembering language: The ELU model.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- The Effects of Working Memory Load on Auditory Distraction in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Inaccurate cortical tracking of speech in adults with impaired speech perception in noise.Brain communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The large body of research that forms the ease of language understanding (ELU) model emphasizes the important contribution of cognitive processes when listening to speech in adverse conditions; however, speech-in-noise (SIN) processing is yet to be thoroughly tested in populations with cognitive deficits. The purpose of the current study was to contribute to the field in this regard by assessing SIN performance in a sample of adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comparing results with age-matched controls. This population was chosen because core symptoms of ADHD include developmental deficits in cognitive control and working memory capacity and because these top-down processes are thought to reach maturity during adolescence in individuals with typical development. The study utilized natural language sentence materials under experimental conditions that manipulated the dependency on cognitive mechanisms in varying degrees. In addition, participants were tested on cognitive capacity measures of complex working memory-span, selective attention, and lexical access. Primary findings were in support of the ELU-model. Age was shown to significantly covary with SIN performance, and after controlling for age, ADHD participants demonstrated greater difficulty than controls with the experimental manipulations. In addition, overall SIN performance was strongly predicted by individual differences in cognitive capacity. Taken together, the results highlight the general disadvantage persons with deficient cognitive capacity have when attending to speech in typically noisy listening environments. Furthermore, the consistently poorer performance observed in the ADHD group suggests that auditory processing tasks designed to tax attention and working memory capacity may prove to be beneficial clinical instruments when diagnosing ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.