ReviewFrontiers in psychology2019
Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Personalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Japanese language learning strategies through learner and expert perspectives: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychological assessment in school contexts: ethical issues and practical guidelines.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024Review
- Article
- Computer-Based Development of Reading Skills to Reduce Dropout in Uncertain Times.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Online Assessment and Game-Based Development of Inductive Reasoning.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Computer-Based Intervention Closes Learning Gap in Maths Accumulated in Remote Learning.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Development of an Adaptive Computer-Aided Soft Sensor Diagnosis System for Assessment of Executive Functions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysing Complex Problem-Solving Strategies from a Cognitive Perspective: The Role of Thinking Skills.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Online Assessment of Morphological Awareness in Grades 2-4: Its Development and Relation to Reading Comprehension.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- A study of reading attitude and reading achievement among young learners in middle school.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Investigating the relationship between students' reading performance, attitudes toward ICT, and economic ability.Heliyon · 2022Article
- English as a foreign language learners' strategy awareness across proficiency levels from the perspective of self-regulated learning metafactors.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Investigating the Relationship Among English Language Learning Strategies, Language Achievement, and Attitude.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Effects of Online Learning on College Students in Eastern China: A Structural Equation Model.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- How we explore, interpret, and solve complex problems: A cross-national study of problem-solving processes.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Exploring the Role of English as a Foreign Language Receptive Skills and Learning Strategy Usage in the Ability to Acquire and Apply Knowledge at the Beginning of Higher Education.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this paper are: to provide a comprehensive introduction to eDia, an online diagnostic assessment system; to show how the use of technology can contribute to solve certain crucial problems in education by supporting the personalization of learning; and to offer a general reference for further eDia-based studies. The primary function for which the system is designed is to provide regular diagnostic feedback in three main domains of education, reading, mathematics, and science, from the beginning of schooling to the end of the 6 years of primary education. The cognitive foundations of the system, the assessment frameworks, are based on a three-dimensional approach in each domain, distinguishing the psychological (reasoning), the application, and the disciplinary (curricular content) dimensions of learning. The frameworks have been carefully mapped into item banks containing over a 1,000 innovative (multimedia-supported) items in each dimension. The online assessments were piloted, and the system has been operating in experimental mode in over 1,000 schools for several years. This paper outlines the theoretical foundations of the eDia system and summarizes how results from research on the cognitive sciences, learning and instruction, and technology-based assessment have been integrated into a working system designed to assess a large population of students. The paper describes the main functions of eDia and discusses how it supports item writing, constructing tests, online test delivery, automated scoring, data processing, scaling and the provision of feedback both for students and teachers. It shows how diagnostic assessments can be implemented in school practice to facilitate differentiated instruction through regular measurements and to provide instruments for teachers to make formative assessments. Beyond its main function (supporting development toward personalizing education), the eDia platform has been used for assessments in a number of areas from pre-school to higher education both in Hungary and in a number of other countries as well. The paper also reviews results from eDia-based studies and highlights how technology-based assessment extends the possibilities of educational research by making more constructs measurable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.