Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333476›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019

Alterations of Functional Brain Connectivity After Long-Duration Spaceflight as Revealed by fMRI.

Ekaterina Pechenkova, Inna Nosikova, Alena Rumshiskaya, Liudmila Litvinova, Ilya Rukavishnikov, Elena Mershina, Valentin Sinitsyn, Angelique Van Ombergen, Ben Jeurissen, Steven Jillings and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cognition in zero gravity: Effects of non-terrestrial gravity on human behaviour.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ekaterina PechenkovaLaboratory for Cognitive Research, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Inna NosikovaInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alena RumshiskayaRadiology Department, Federal Center of Treatment and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia.
Liudmila LitvinovaRadiology Department, Federal Center of Treatment and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia.
Ilya RukavishnikovInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Elena MershinaMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Valentin SinitsynMedical Research and Educational Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Angelique Van OmbergenLab for Equilibrium Investigations and Aerospace, Faculty of Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ben JeurisseniMec/Vision Lab, Faculty of Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Steven JillingsLab for Equilibrium Investigations and Aerospace, Faculty of Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Steven LaureysComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Centre, Neurology Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jan SijbersiMec/Vision Lab, Faculty of Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alexey GrishinGagarin Cosmonauts Training Center, Star City, Russia.
Ludmila ChernikovaInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Ivan NaumovInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Ludmila KornilovaInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Floris L WuytsLab for Equilibrium Investigations and Aerospace, Faculty of Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Elena TomilovskayaInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Inessa KozlovskayaInstitute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study reports alterations of task-based functional brain connectivity in a group of 11 cosmonauts after a long-duration spaceflight, compared to a healthy control group not involved in the space program. To elicit the postural and locomotor sensorimotor mechanisms that are usually most significantly impaired when space travelers return to Earth, a plantar stimulation paradigm was used in a block design fMRI study. The motor control system activated by the plantar stimulation involved the pre-central and post-central gyri, SMA, SII/operculum, and, to a lesser degree, the insular cortex and cerebellum. While no post-flight alterations were observed in terms of activation, the network-based statistics approach revealed task-specific functional connectivity modifications within a broader set of regions involving the activation sites along with other parts of the sensorimotor neural network and the visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular systems. The most notable findings included a post-flight increase in the stimulation-specific connectivity of the right posterior supramarginal gyrus with the rest of the brain; a strengthening of connections between the left and right insulae; decreased connectivity of the vestibular nuclei, right inferior parietal cortex (BA40) and cerebellum with areas associated with motor, visual, vestibular, and proprioception functions; and decreased coupling of the cerebellum with the visual cortex and the right inferior parietal cortex. The severity of space motion sickness symptoms was found to correlate with a post- to pre-flight difference in connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and the left anterior insula. Due to the complex nature and rapid dynamics of adaptation to gravity alterations, the post-flight findings might be attributed to both the long-term microgravity exposure and to the readaptation to Earth's gravity that took place between the landing and post-flight MRI session. Nevertheless, the results have implications for the multisensory reweighting and gravitational motor system theories, generating hypotheses to be tested in future research.

Indexed as

brain plasticitycosmonautsfMRIfunctional connectivitymicrogravityspaceflightsupport stimulationvestibular function

Identifiers

PMID31333476
PMCPMC6621543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.