Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333397›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Constructing an Associative Memory System Using Spiking Neural Network.

Hu He, Yingjie Shang, Xu Yang, Yingze Di, Jiajun Lin, Yimeng Zhu, Wenhao Zheng, Jinfeng Zhao, Mengyao Ji, Liya Dong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pseudo-transistors for emerging neuromorphic electronics.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Developing Intelligent Robots that Grasp Affordance.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022
    Review
  9. An entropic associative memory.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hu HeInstitute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yingjie ShangInstitute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xu YangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yingze DiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jiajun LinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yimeng ZhuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Wenhao ZhengSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jinfeng ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Mengyao JiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Liya DongInstitute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ning DengInstitute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yunlin LeiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Zenghao ChaiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of computer science has led to the blooming of artificial intelligence (AI), and neural networks are the core of AI research. Although mainstream neural networks have done well in the fields of image processing and speech recognition, they do not perform well in models aimed at understanding contextual information. In our opinion, the reason for this is that the essence of building a neural network through parameter training is to fit the data to the statistical law through parameter training. Since the neural network built using this approach does not possess memory ability, it cannot reflect the relationship between data with respect to the causality. Biological memory is fundamentally different from the current mainstream digital memory in terms of the storage method. The information stored in digital memory is converted to binary code and written in separate storage units. This physical isolation destroys the correlation of information. Therefore, the information stored in digital memory does not have the recall or association functions of biological memory which can present causality. In this paper, we present the results of our preliminary effort at constructing an associative memory system based on a spiking neural network. We broke the neural network building process into two phases: the Structure Formation Phase and the Parameter Training Phase. The Structure Formation Phase applies a learning method based on Hebb's rule to provoke neurons in the memory layer growing new synapses to connect to neighbor neurons as a response to the specific input spiking sequences fed to the neural network. The aim of this phase is to train the neural network to memorize the specific input spiking sequences. During the Parameter Training Phase, STDP and reinforcement learning are employed to optimize the weight of synapses and thus to find a way to let the neural network recall the memorized specific input spiking sequences. The results show that our memory neural network could memorize different targets and could recall the images it had memorized.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceassociative memory systemHebb's rulespiking neural networkSTDP

Identifiers

PMID31333397
PMCPMC6615473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.