Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333352›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2019

Venom allergy treatment practices in Poland in comparison to guidelines: next edition of the national audit.

Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz, Marcin Stobiecki, Marita Nittner-Marszalska, Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Piotr Brzyski, Immunotherapy Section of the Polish Society of Allergology Working Group (PTA)

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review of Honeybee Venom Allergens and Allergenicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bee Venom in Wound Healing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ewa Cichocka-JaroszDepartment of Paediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marcin StobieckiDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marita Nittner-MarszalskaDepartment of Internal Disease and Allergology, Medical University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Urszula Jedynak-WąsowiczDepartment of Paediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Brzyski"Dziupla" Statistical Analysis, Krakow, Poland.
Immunotherapy Section of the Polish Society of Allergology Working Group (PTA)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVenom immunotherapy treatment (VIT) is the only causal treatment of hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis, which aims to provide long-lasting immunoprotection against severe reactions to subsequent stings.

aimTo reassess the compliance of VIT procedures in the Polish allergy centres with the European guidelines. MATERIAL AND

methodsA structured questionnaire survey conducted in all 33 VIT-centres. The response rate was 94%.

resultsThe ultrarush initial protocol was the most common protocol (71%,

conclusionsIn the most important procedures, there is a very high compliance with the guidelines. In the areas where the guidelines are not precise, we observed a large spread of results.

Indexed as

immunotherapynational surveyvenom allergy

Identifiers

PMID31333352
PMCPMC6640023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.