Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333164›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Sickle Cell Education: A Survey of Antenatal Healthcare Givers.

Serwah Aboagye, Magdalene Torto, Kwaku Asah-Opoku, Mercy Anna Nuamah, Samuel Antwi Oppong, Ali Samba

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Serwah AboagyeCardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Magdalene TortoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Kwaku Asah-OpokuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Mercy Anna NuamahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Samuel Antwi OppongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Ali SambaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHUniversity of Ghana · GHCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the educational practices of antenatal care providers toward pregnant women with sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle cell trait (SCT), a survey was conducted among selected doctors and midwives who provide antenatal care at the outpatient clinic of the Obstetric Department of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. The study explored their practices of screening for and patient education about SCD and SCT. Of the 102 respondents, 100(98%) stated that they were knowledgeable in the medical and genetic aspects of the disease. Regarding screening, 82(80.4%) reported mandatory screening for SCD, 9(8.8%) did not offer screening as routine, and 11(10.8%) gave patients the choice. The majority (93.1%) always informed patients when the test was positive but health-care providers less than six years experience were less likely to communicate SCT status to patients without the trait (odds ratio [OR] = 0.41, 95% CI [0.18-0.93]). Nurses/midwives were less likely to tell patients their carrier status (OR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.10-0.59]). There was also variation in referral practices for genetic counseling, with 26.5% always referring, 28.4% never doing so, and 45.1% only referring if the patient had questions. This may affect patients' awareness of this genetic condition. Therefore, continuous medical education on SCD/SCT and standardization of counseling may help inform couples' family planning choices and reduce the burden of the disease on future generation and health care.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrenatal CareFemaleGenetic CounselingGhanaHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatientsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31333164
PMCPMC6726940
OpenAlexW2963121621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.