Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332947›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2019

Advancing the integration of multi-marker metabarcoding data in dietary analysis of trophic generalists.

Luís P da Silva, Vanessa A Mata, Pedro B Lopes, Paulo Pereira, Simon N Jarman, Ricardo J Lopes, Pedro Beja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of the OmnivorousEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Black-throated blue warblers (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA metabarcoding the diet ofCurrent zoology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luís P da SilvaCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2358-1277
Vanessa A MataCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3005-9030
Pedro B LopesErada, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-0602
Paulo PereiraCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-7691
Simon N JarmanCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-9686
Ricardo J LopesCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2193-5107
Pedro BejaCIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-0760

Funding

BREAST CANCER AND GENE POLYMORPHISMS IN CHINESE WOMENR01CA084141 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CHEN, CHU · 2001 to 2003
$1.4M
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/02064/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LTER/BIA-BEC/0004/2009Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/113462/2015Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/128492/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/84141/2012H2020-EU.4.c. - Establishing 'ERA Chairs' 668981NORTE2020 NORTE-01- 0145-FEDER-AGRIGEN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of DNA metabarcoding to dietary analysis of trophic generalists requires using multiple markers in order to overcome problems of primer specificity and bias. However, limited attention has been given to the integration of information from multiple markers, particularly when they partly overlap in the taxa amplified, and vary in taxonomic resolution and biases. Here, we test the use of a mix of universal and specific markers, provide criteria to integrate multi-marker metabarcoding data and a python script to implement such criteria and produce a single list of taxa ingested per sample. We then compare the results of dietary analysis based on morphological methods, single markers, and the proposed combination of multiple markers. The study was based on the analysis of 115 faeces from a small passerine, the Black Wheatears (Oenanthe leucura). Morphological analysis detected far fewer plant taxa (12) than either a universal 18S marker (57) or the plant trnL marker (124). This may partly reflect the detection of secondary ingestion by molecular methods. Morphological identification also detected far fewer taxa (23) than when using 18S (91) or the arthropod markers IN16STK (244) and ZBJ (231), though each method missed or underestimated some prey items. Integration of multi-marker data provided far more detailed dietary information than any single marker and estimated higher frequencies of occurrence of all taxa. Overall, our results show the value of integrating data from multiple, taxonomically overlapping markers in an example dietary data set.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDietDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPasseriformesBiomarkersDNAbirddietmetabarcodingmorphological identificationoverlapping markerssecondary predation

Identifiers

PMID31332947
PMCPMC6899665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.