Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332919›Full record

SynthesisJournal of viral hepatitis2019

Hepatitis B and C testing strategies in healthcare and community settings in the EU/EEA: A systematic review.

Lauren M K Mason, Irene K Veldhuijzen, Erika Duffell, Ayla van Ahee, Eveline M Bunge, Andrew J Amato-Gauci, Lara Tavoschi

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus screening, and subsequent monitoring or treatment among pregnant women in the Netherlands.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren M K MasonPallas Health Research and Consultancy B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-3200
Irene K VeldhuijzenThe Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Erika DuffellEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ayla van AheePallas Health Research and Consultancy B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eveline M BungePallas Health Research and Consultancy B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew J Amato-GauciEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lara TavoschiEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2217-4664
Buijs Advice and Consultancy (Netherlands) · NLEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SENational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 9 million individuals are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), many of which are yet to be diagnosed. We performed a systematic review to identify interventions effective at improving testing offer and uptake in the EU/EEA. Original research articles published between 1 January 2008 and 1 September 2017 were retrieved from PubMed and EMBASE. Search strings combined terms for HBV/HCV, intervention, testing and geographic terms (EU/EEA). Out of 8331 records retrieved, 93 studies were selected. Included studies reported on testing initiatives in primary health care (9), hospital (12), other healthcare settings (31) and community settings (41). Testing initiatives targeted population groups such as migrants, drug users, prisoners, pregnant women and the general population. Testing targeted to populations at higher risk yielded high coverage rates in many settings. Implementation of novel testing approaches, including dried blood spot (DBS) testing, was associated with increased coverage in several settings including drug services, pharmacies and STI clinics. Community-based testing services were effective in reaching populations at higher risk for infection, vulnerable and hard-to-reach populations. In conclusion, our review identified several successful testing approaches implemented in healthcare and community settings, including testing approaches targeting groups at higher risk, community-based testing services and DBS testing. Combining a diverse set of testing opportunities within national testing strategies may lead to higher impact both in terms of testing coverage and in terms of reduction, on the undiagnosed fraction.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHepacivirusHepatitis B virusEuropeFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis CHospitalsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPrimary Health CarePublic Health SurveillanceEuropehepatitis Bhepatitis Cscreeningtesting

Identifiers

PMID31332919
PMCPMC6899601
OpenAlexW2964197448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.