Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332894›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

PERSPECTIVES: Stroke survivors' views on the design of an early-phase cell therapy trial for patients with chronic ischaemic stroke.

Anjali Nagpal, Susan Hillier, Austin G Milton, Monica A Hamilton-Bruce, Simon A Koblar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PERSPECTIVES: Stroke survivors' views on the design of an early-phase cell therapy trial for patients with chronic ischaemic stroke.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anjali NagpalStroke Research Programme, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2711-445X
Susan HillierSansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Austin G MiltonStroke Research Programme, Departments of Neurology and Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, & Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Monica A Hamilton-BruceStroke Research Programme, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Simon A KoblarStroke Research Programme, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

Stroke SA (South Australia)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStem cell research holds the potential for a paradigm shift in the management of diseases such as stroke. Patient and public involvement in research (PPIR) can bring a focus to issues of clinical relevance and accelerate translation to real-world clinical practice.

objectiveA qualitative thematic analysis of the perspectives of stroke survivors regarding the conduct and design aspects of a proposed phase I clinical cell therapy study in stroke.

designTwelve stroke survivors were purposively recruited in July 2016-August 2017 and participated in semi-structured, face-to-face interviews for input into the design of a proposed phase I clinical study of autologous dental pulp stem cells. Concurrent thematic analysis was conducted until data saturation was achieved. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsParticipants conveyed that the most relevant outcomes to them were regaining participation, decreased dependence on caregivers and improvement in cognition, memory, mood, pain and fatigue. The perception of risk vs. benefit was likely influenced by the time elapsed since stroke, with participants being more willing to accept a higher level of risk early in the post-stroke disease course. They believed that all stroke survivors should be given an opportunity to participate in research, irrespective of their cognitive capacity. A relatively small sample population of 12 stroke survivors was studied as thematic saturation was achieved. PERSPECTIVES study applied principles of PPIR to early-phase cell research. Incorporation of outcomes relevant to patients' need within the study design is critical to generate data that will enable personalized application of regenerative medicine in stroke.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationRisk AssessmentStem Cell TransplantationStrokeSurvivorsinformed consentpatient participationqualitative researchstem cell researchstrokesurvivors

Identifiers

PMID31332894
PMCPMC6803398
OpenAlexW2964167006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.