Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332726›Full record

SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2019

A Meta-Analysis Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Harboring Chromosome 9P Loss.

Vincenzo Di Nunno, Veronica Mollica, Matteo Brunelli, Lidia Gatto, Riccardo Schiavina, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Matteo Santoni, Rodolfo Montironi, Anna Caliò, Albino Eccher and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNA Methylation inCancers · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo Di NunnoDivision of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Albertoni n 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Veronica MollicaDivision of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Albertoni n 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Pathology AOUI, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lidia GattoOncology Unit, SG Moscati Hospital of Taranto, Taranto, Italy.
Riccardo SchiavinaDepartment of Urology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Michelangelo FiorentinoPathology Service, Addarii Institute of Oncology, S-Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo SantoniOncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, via Santa Lucia 2, Macerata, Italy.
Rodolfo MontironiSection of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, United Hospitals, Ancona, Italy.
Anna CaliòDepartment of Pathology AOUI, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology AOUI, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele MilellaSection of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine, Verona, Italy.
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Pathology AOUI, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Eugenio BrunocillaDepartment of Urology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco MassariDivision of Oncology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Albertoni n 15, 40138, Bologna, Italy. francesco.massari@aosp.bo.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6476-6871
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITUniversity of Verona · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale di Macerata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context9p loss appears a reliable and promising marker able to differentiate specific categories of patients with renal cell carcinoma associated with a worse prognosis.

objectiveThe aim was to systematically evaluate relative risk of death, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients harboring 9p loss. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found a total of 92 potentially relevant articles focused on the detection of 9p loss in patients with renal cell carcinoma and clinical outcomes of this population. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were employed to carry out this work. Fourteen studies resulted to be eligible for this analysis; 11 of these reported data on 5-year overall survival, six on CSS and four on DFS. An increased risk of death has been observed in patients harboring 9p loss (pooled relative risk of 3.965; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.647-5.940, p < 0.001). Similarly, worse CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 6.776; 95% CI 3.824-12.009; p < 0.001) and DFS (HR 2.914; 95% CI 1.245-6.819; p = 0.014) have been observed in this population. Heterogeneity was significant in survival analysis, while no significant heterogeneity was observed in the CSS and DFS analyses.

conclusionsPatients harboring chromosome 9p loss have worse clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival, CSS and DFS.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 9Carcinoma, Renal CellGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKidney NeoplasmsPatient Outcome AssessmentPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31332726
OpenAlexW2964292183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.