ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2020
Do all intra-ventricular conduction defect ECG patterns respond equally to CRT?
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contributions of Israel to the field of clinical cardiac electrophysiology and implantable devices.Heart rhythm O2 · 2024Article
- HOT CRT-The Effective Combination of Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization and His Bundle Pacing.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeResponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well-established in patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) but modest or even negative in those with intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). However, IVCD pattern is heterogeneous, and it is possible that QRS patterns may also respond to CRT.
methodsConsecutive baseline ECGs of 239 patients implanted between 2007 and 2010 with CRT were analyzed. ECGs were classified into the following three groups: (a) typical LBBB (TLBBB) according to accepted guidelines (n = 67); (b) IVCD with LBBB pattern criteria in V1, 1, and aVL but with QS or rS in V5-V6 which we defined as atypical LBBB (ALBBB) (n = 74); and (c) all other IVCD (OIVCD) patterns (n = 98). Endpoints were 2 years mortality and echocardiographic response, defined as a decrease of ≥ 10% in indexed LVESV or an increase of ≥ 5% in left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 year of follow-up.
resultsBaseline clinical characteristics were similar among all the three groups. Rates of echocardiographic response were lower among those with OIVCD compared to those with LBBB and ALBBB (50% vs. 75% and 72%, respectively, p = 0.01 for both comparisons). A multivariable model showed a lower likelihood of echocardiographic response in OIVCD [HR = 0.40; (0.16-0.98)] and a similar likelihood in ALBBBB [HR = 0.98; (0.40-2.40)] compared to TLBBB. Cumulative 2-year survival was 88% in ALBBB, 86% in TLBBB, and 76% in OIVCD (p value = 0.011).
conclusionPatients with ALBBB may have a favorable echocardiographic response to CRT and display similar survival rates to typical LBBB. This subgroup of IVCD should be considered for CRT. Atypical left bundle branch morphology defined as QS or rS in lead V1, broad R waves in lead I, and aVL but with QS or rS in V5-V6 is associated with favorable echocardiographic response to CRT and displays similar survival rates to typical LBBB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31332607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.