Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332573›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2019

MD simulation of methane adsorption properties on pillared graphene bubble models.

Hao Jiang, Xin-Lu Cheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao JiangInstitute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Xin-Lu ChengInstitute of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China. chengxl@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11774248 and 11474207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pillared graphene bubble framework is selected as the methane storage vessel in this article. All investigations of methane adsorption are executed by using the MD simulations. The average adsorption energy of methane on different bubble models is between - 4.3 and - 5.2 kcal/mol, which is desirable for absorbing and desorbing gas molecules. The methane adsorption properties of bubble models are obviously different from those of pillared graphene. The effect of graphene interlayer spacing on methane adsorption in selected bubble models can be negligible. Nevertheless, bubble density and temperature have a significant influence on methane adsorption. The amount of adsorbed methane on pillared bubble models at room temperature can reach up to 18.2 mmol/g. This performance of methane adsorption on pillared graphene bubble structures may bring new enlightenment to the investigations of gas storage materials.

Indexed as

Adsorption energyMD simulationMethane storagePillared graphene bubble

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.