Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332565›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2020

Remote computer-assisted analysis of ICG fluorescence signal for evaluation of small intestinal anastomotic perfusion: a blinded, randomized, experimental trial.

Kristina Gosvig, Signe Steenstrup Jensen, Niels Qvist, Vincent Agnus, Troels Steenstrup Jensen, Veronique Lindner, Jacques Marescaux, Michele Diana, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina GosvigDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, OUH, Odense, Denmark. kristinagosvig@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-355X
Signe Steenstrup JensenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Niels QvistDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Vincent AgnusIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France.
Troels Steenstrup Jensen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Veronique LindnerPathology Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France.
Michele DianaIRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France.
Mark Bremholm EllebækDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FROdense University Hospital · DKOdense Municipality · DKUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) may be used to visualize intestinal perfusion prior to anastomosis. Methods for quantification of the fluorescence signal are required to ensure an objective evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a method for quantification of relative perfusion and to investigate the correlation between the perfusion level and the anastomotic strength.

methodThis blinded, randomized, experimental trial included twenty pigs. Each pig received three small intestinal anastomoses with 30%, 60%, or 100% perfusion, respectively. The perfusion levels were determined relative to healthy intestine using ICG-FI. Ischemia was induced by mesenteric ligation and the perfusion level of each anastomosis was determined using a software-based analysis of the fluorescence signal. On postoperative day 5, the anastomoses were subjected to tensile strength test and histopathological assessment.

resultsNo anastomotic leakage occurred. The tensile strength of the 30% perfusion group was 9.09 N, which was significantly lower than the 60% perfusion group (11.5 N) and the 100% perfusion group (12.9 N). The difference between the 60% perfusion group and the 100% perfusion group was not significant. The histopathological assessment showed no significant differences between perfusion groups.

conclusionsA reduction in blood supply to 30%, as determined by ICG-FI, in small intestinal anastomoses was necessary to demonstrate a decrease in tensile strength.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalFemaleFluorescenceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntestine, SmallMalePerfusionSingle-Blind MethodAnastomotic leakageFluorescence imagingIndocyanine greenTensile strength

Identifiers

PMID31332565
OpenAlexW2962695004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.