Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332548›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Application of high expansion degradable cotton in nasal bleeding model of dog.

Bing Zhong, Feng Liu, Feng-Juan Yang, Chun-Shu Wu, Jin-Tao Du, Shi-Xi Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing ZhongDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China. lfdoctorent@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4362
Feng-Juan YangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Chun-Shu WuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Jin-Tao DuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Shi-Xi LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (CN) 339180742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discomfort and complications have always been problems for nasal packing materials. This study provided a new nasal packing material called high expansion degradable cotton (HEDC).

methodsNasal endoscopic surgery was used to establish a dog model of nasal bleeding, and wound surfaces were filled with Merocel, Nasopore and HEDC, respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding of 24 h was calculated. We evaluate the absorbability score, adhesion score, infection sore and nasal mucosal epithelium in postoperative 3, 7, 14 and 28 days. HE staining and electron microscopy were used to evaluate the recovery of nasal mucosa.

resultsThere was no significant difference in nasal bleeding between HEDC, Merocel and Nasopore. Nasal endoscopic examination revealed HEDC absorbability of score, adhesion score, infection score were significantly lower than Merocel and Nasopore. The epithelialization time of HEDC was significantly shorter than that of Merocel and Nasopore. HE staining showed that HEDC and Nasopore could significantly reduce scar hyperplasia on the wound surface. The results of electron microscopy suggested that HEDC could protect the edge cilia of the wound.

conclusionHEDC could be used as new choice for hemostasis after nasal endoscopic surgery, which could reduce nasal epithelialization time, and protect wound edge cilia.

Indexed as

AnimalsDogsEpistaxisFormaldehydeHemostaticsHemostatic TechniquesHumansModels, AnimalNasal Surgical ProceduresNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPolyvinyl AlcoholPostoperative HemorrhageTissue AdhesionsTreatment OutcomeFormaldehydeHemostaticsPolyvinyl Alcoholpolyvinyl alcohol formaldehyde foamEpithelizationHigh expansion degradable cottonMerocelNasal endoscopic surgeryNasopore

Identifiers

PMID31332548
OpenAlexW2963486568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.