Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332293›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2020

Literature review and suggested protocol for prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection.

Otavio Azevedo Magalhaes, Ahmed Shalaby Bardan, Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati, Christopher Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Beyond the surface: a comprehensive review of corneal endotheliitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Etiology, surgical management, and outcomes of patients with scleral thinning.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Prescription patterns in DMEK: European survey.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Main issues in penetrating keratoplasty.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Otavio Azevedo MagalhaesPorto Alegre Eye Bank Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil. otaviomaga@yahoo.com.br.
Ahmed Shalaby BardanSussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, England.
Mehran Zarei-GhanavatiEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Christopher LiuSussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective prophylaxis and treatment of corneal graft rejection are essential to improve outcomes in corneal transplantation. To date, there has been no standardized protocol published that outlines the optimal prophylactic and therapeutic approaches and, furthermore, the published controlled trials on this subject are limited. Likewise, no study has addressed how the level of antigen exposure varies between different types of keratoplasties. The aim of this paper is to provide a simple evidence-based protocol for the prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationGraft RejectionHumans

Identifiers

PMID31332293
PMCPMC7042259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.