Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332235›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Modified CLARITY Achieving Faster and Better Intact Mouse Brain Clearing and Immunostaining.

Hao Du, Peihong Hou, Liting Wang, Zhongke Wang, Qiyu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao DuDepartment of Anatomy, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Peihong HouDepartment of Anatomy, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Liting WangBiomedical Analysis Center, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhongke WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Qiyu LiDepartment of Anatomy, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. liqiyu_99@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CLARITY is a hydrogel embedding clearing method that has the advantages of transparency, different tissue compatibility and immunostaining compatibility. However, there are also some limitations to CLARITY as it requires a long time to achieve transparency, and the electrophoresis clearing is complex. Therefore, we aimed to simplify the electrophoresis system and shorten the processing time of CLARITY. In our study, we developed a non-circulation electrophoresis system to achieve easier manipulation of electrophoresis clearing. We modified the original CLARITY protocol in hydrogel embedding methods, clearing buffer and immunostaining. When comparing brains processed by our modified method or the original protocol, we found our modifications permit faster and more efficient clearing and labeling. Moreover, we developed a new clearing method named Passive pRe-Electrophroresis CLARITY (PRE-CLARITY) and a new immunostaining method named Centrifugation-Expansion staining (CEx staining). PRE-CLARITY achieved faster clearing and higher transparency, and CEx staining accomplished intact mouse brain labeling faster. With our modifications to CLARITY, we accomplished intact mouse brain clearing and immunostaining within one week, while this requires weeks to months with the original CLARITY. Our studies would allow high-content tracing and analysis of intact brain or other large-scale samples in a short time.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryHydrogelsAnimalsBrainColoring AgentsElectrophoresisImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalColoring AgentsHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID31332235
PMCPMC6646319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.