Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332212›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Locating potentially lethal genes using the abnormal distributions of genotypes.

Xiaojun Ding, Xiaoshu Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojun DingSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, China. ding.xiaojun@foxmail.com.
Xiaoshu ZhuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, China. xszhu@csu.edu.cn.
Yulin Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes are the basic functional units of heredity. Differences in genes can lead to various congenital physical conditions. One kind of these differences is caused by genetic variations named single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). An SNP is a variation in a single nucleotide that occurs at a specific position in the genome. Some SNPs can affect splice sites and protein structures and cause gene abnormalities. SNPs on paired chromosomes may lead to fatal diseases so that a fertilized embryo cannot develop into a normal fetus or the people born with these abnormalities die in childhood. The distributions of genotypes on these SNP sites are different from those on other sites. Based on this idea, we present a novel statistical method to detect the abnormal distributions of genotypes and locate the potentially lethal genes. The test was performed on HapMap data and 74 suspicious SNPs were found. Ten SNP maps "reviewed" genes in the NCBI database. Among them, 5 genes were related to fatal childhood diseases or embryonic development, 1 gene can cause spermatogenic failure, and the other 4 genes were associated with many genetic diseases. The results validated our method. The method is very simple and is guaranteed by a statistical test. It is an inexpensive way to discover potentially lethal genes and the mutation sites. The mined genes deserve further study.

Indexed as

Genes, LethalChildChromosome MappingDatabases, GeneticEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenotypeHumansMaleModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancySpermatogenesisUnsupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID31332212
PMCPMC6646374
OpenAlexW2963562264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.