Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332019›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences.

Elie Rassi, Andreas Wutz, Nadia Müller-Voggel, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spontaneous network transitions predict somatosensory perception.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spontaneous Network Coupling Enables Efficient Task Performance without Local Task-Induced Activations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elie RassiCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; elie.elrassi@sbg.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-5373
Andreas WutzCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Nadia Müller-VoggelCenter for Biomagnetismus, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Nathan WeiszCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF M 2496Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms-that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception-that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences.

Indexed as

BiasFeedbackConfidence IntervalsDecision MakingHumansMagnetoencephalographyVisual PerceptionconnectivityMEGoscillationsprestimulusvisual object perception

Identifiers

PMID31332019
PMCPMC6689959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.