ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-Dependent Heart-Brain Interactions Regulate Human Self-Awareness.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Spontaneous changes in the prestimulus alpha power predict both objective and subjective aspects of perception-evidence from 4 paradigms and 471 experimental sessions.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Rapid computation of high-level visual surprise.iScience · 2025Article
- Spontaneous network transitions predict somatosensory perception.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- A multiplex of connectome trajectories enables several connectivity patterns in parallel.eLife · 2025Article
- Context-Sensitive Conscious Interpretation and Layer-5 Pyramidal Neurons in Multistable Perception.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Spontaneous slow cortical potentials and brain oscillations independently influence conscious visual perception.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Relevance of pre-stimulus oscillatory activity for the perceived valence of emotional facial expressions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Network mechanisms of ongoing brain activity's influence on conscious visual perception.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Bias in Prestimulus Motor Cortical Activity Determines Decision-making Error in Rodents.Experimental neurobiology · 2023Article
- Accounting for endogenous effects in decision-making with a non-linear diffusion decision model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Efficient Prestimulus Network Integration of Fusiform Face Area Biases Face Perception during Binocular Rivalry.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- New methods for oscillation analyses push new theories of discrete cognition.Psychophysiology · 2022Review
- Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Connectomics of human electrophysiology.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Pre-stimulus Alpha Activity Modulates Face and Object Processing in the Intra-Parietal Sulcus, a MEG Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Long-term priors influence visual perception through recruitment of long-range feedback.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The role of attention and explicit knowledge in perceiving bistable auditory input.Psychophysiology · 2021Article
- Spontaneous Network Coupling Enables Efficient Task Performance without Local Task-Induced Activations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms-that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception-that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.