Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332015›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

The neural representation of facial-emotion categories reflects conceptual structure.

Jeffrey A Brooks, Junichi Chikazoe, Norihiro Sadato, Jonathan B Freeman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Internal representations of facial emotions in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Multidimensional Neural Representation of Face Impressions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey A BrooksDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003; jab1148@nyu.edu jon.freeman@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6370-3622
Junichi ChikazoeDepartment of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-1370
Norihiro SadatoDepartment of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Jonathan B FreemanDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003; jab1148@nyu.edu jon.freeman@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-8460
National Institute for Physiological Sciences · JPNew York University · US

Funding

Investigating the Neural Basis of Flexible Emotion PerceptionR01MH112640 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FREEMAN, JONATHAN BRONNER · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans reliably categorize configurations of facial actions into specific emotion categories, leading some to argue that this process is invariant between individuals and cultures. However, growing behavioral evidence suggests that factors such as emotion-concept knowledge may shape the way emotions are visually perceived, leading to variability-rather than universality-in facial-emotion perception. Understanding variability in emotion perception is only emerging, and the neural basis of any impact from the structure of emotion-concept knowledge remains unknown. In a neuroimaging study, we used a representational similarity analysis (RSA) approach to measure the correspondence between the conceptual, perceptual, and neural representational structures of the six emotion categories Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, and Surprise. We found that subjects exhibited individual differences in their conceptual structure of emotions, which predicted their own unique perceptual structure. When viewing faces, the representational structure of multivoxel patterns in the right fusiform gyrus was significantly predicted by a subject's unique conceptual structure, even when controlling for potential physical similarity in the faces themselves. Finally, cross-cultural differences in emotion perception were also observed, which could be explained by individual differences in conceptual structure. Our results suggest that the representational structure of emotion expressions in visual face-processing regions may be shaped by idiosyncratic conceptual understanding of emotion categories.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAnimalsBehaviorBrainEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceYoung Adultconceptual knowledgeemotion perceptionfacial expressionsfunctional magnetic resonance imagingfusiform gyrus

Identifiers

PMID31332015
PMCPMC6689944
OpenAlexW2963972922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.