Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331635›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Analytical Expressions and Physics for Single-Cell mRNA Distributions of the lac Operon of E. coli.

Krishna Choudhary, Atul Narang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Krishna ChoudharyGladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: krishna.choudhary@gladstone.ucsf.edu.
Atul NarangDepartment of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: anarang@dbeb.iitd.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanistic models of stochastic gene expression are of considerable interest, but their complexity often precludes tractable analytical expressions for messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein distributions. The lac operon of Escherichia coli is a model system with regulatory elements such as multiple operators and DNA looping that are shared by many operons. Although this system is complex, intuition suggests that fast DNA looping may simplify it by causing the repressor-bound states of the operon to equilibrate rapidly, thus ensuring that the subsequent dynamics are governed by slow transitions between the repressor-free and the equilibrated repressor-bound states. Here, we show that this intuition is correct by applying singular perturbation theory to a mechanistic model of lac transcription with the scaled time constant of DNA looping as the perturbation parameter. We find that at steady state, the repressor-bound states satisfy detailed balance and are dominated by the looped states; moreover, the interaction between the repressor-free and the equilibrated repressor-bound states is described by an extension of the Peccoud-Ycart two-state model in which both (repressor-free and repressor-bound) states support transcription. The solution of this extended two-state model reveals that the steady-state mRNA distribution is a mixture of the Poisson and negative hypergeometric distributions, which reflects mRNAs obtained by transcription from the repressor-bound and repressor-free states. Finally, we show that the physics revealed by perturbation theory makes it easy to derive the extended two-state model equations for complex regulatory architectures.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialSingle-Cell AnalysisEscherichia coliLac OperonModels, GeneticRNA, MessengerRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31331635
PMCPMC6697386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.