Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331452›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of the medical sciences2019

Trends in Out-of-Pocket Burden in United States Adults with Kidney Disease: 2002-2011.

Mukoso N Ozieh, Kinfe G Bishu, Clara E Dismuke, Leonard E Egede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mukoso N OziehDivision of Nephrology; Center for Advancing Population Science (CAPS), Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Clement J. Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: mozieh@mcw.edu.
Kinfe G BishuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Clara E DismukeHealth Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina.
Leonard E EgedeCenter for Advancing Population Science (CAPS), Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001438 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI WIDLANSKY, MICHAEL E · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Technology Intensified Diabetes Education Study in AA with T2DM (TIDES)K24DK093699 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI EGEDE, LEONARD E. · 2011 to 2020
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001438NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK093699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh out-of-pocket (OOP) cost is a barrier to healthcare access and treatment compliance. Our study examined high OOP healthcare cost and burden trends in adults with kidney disease (KD).

methodsUsing Medical Expenditure Survey 2002-2011 data, we examined the proportion of people greater than 17 years old with KD whose OOP burden was high. Trends by insurance status (private, public or none) and trends by income level (poor, low, middle or high income) were also examined in this study.

resultsApproximately 16% of people with KD faced high OOP burden in 2011. The proportion of adults with high OOP burden between 2002 and 2011 fell by 9.7 percentage points. The proportion of privately insured adults facing high OOP burden decreased by 4.7, those who were publicly insured 22.4, and those who were uninsured, 3.1 percentage points. The proportion of those facing high OOP burden who were poor/near poor fell by 26.5, those who had low income 13.4, and those who had middle income, 9 percentage points.

conclusionsThough high OOP burden declined between 2002 and 2011 in the US population with KD, most of the decline was among the publicly insured, so the uninsured populations with KD remain vulnerable. Providers and policy makers should be aware of the vulnerability of uninsured individuals with KD to high OOP burden.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessModels, EconomicAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansIncomeKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisUnited StatesYoung AdultKidney diseaseMEPSOut-of-pocket burden

Identifiers

PMID31331452
PMCPMC6927549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.