Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331404›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Evaluation of three behavioural economics 'nudges' on grocery and convenience store sales of promoted nutritious foods.

Leah Elizabeth Chapman, Claire Sadeghzadeh, Maria Koutlas, Catherine Zimmer, Molly De Marco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Improving Consumption and Purchases of Healthier Foods in Retail Environments: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Online Pilot Grocery Intervention among Rural and Urban Residents Aimed to Improve Purchasing Habits.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Food environment solutions for childhood obesity in Latin America and among Latinos living in the United States.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah Elizabeth ChapmanDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 245 Rosenau Hall, CB # 7461, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Claire SadeghzadehCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Maria KoutlasCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Catherine ZimmerThe Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Molly De MarcoDepartment of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 245 Rosenau Hall, CB # 7461, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between three behavioural economics 'nudges' and store sales of promoted healthier foods.

designMultiple interrupted time series.

settingTwo predominantly rural counties in central North Carolina, USA.

participantsAggregated store transaction data from two grocery stores (one intervention, one control) and two convenience stores (one intervention, one control) were analysed using ANOVA to examine the association between three 'nudges' and store sales of promoted items. The nudges included: a 'cognitive fatigue' experiment, in which floor arrows guided customers to the produce sections; a 'scarcity' experiment, in which one sign in one area of the produce section portrayed a 'limited amount' message; and a 'product placement' experiment, where granola bars were moved into the candy bar aisle.

resultsIn convenience stores, there were no significant differences between sales of the promoted items during the intervention period for any of the nudges when implemented individually. However, compared with baseline sales, implementation of all three nudges simultaneously was associated with an increase in sales during the intervention period based on proportional computations (P = 0·001), whereas no significant changes in sales were observed in the control convenience store. Among the grocery stores, there were no significant differences in sales during the intervention period for any of the nudges or the combined intervention compared with baseline sales.

conclusionsImplementing three nudges concurrently in a convenience store setting may increase sales of promoted items. However, before stores consider implementing these nudges to increase sales of nutritious foods, additional research is warranted.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood PreferencesAdolescentAdultAgedChoice BehaviorCommerceDietEconomics, BehavioralFemaleFoodFood SupplyHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedBehavioural economicsChoice architectureFood choiceFood environmentFood stores

Identifiers

PMID31331404
PMCPMC10260446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.