Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331379›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019

Patient experience of spinal immobilisation after trauma.

Camilla Ikast Ottosen, Jacob Steinmetz, Mo Haslund Larsen, Josefine S Baekgaard, Lars S Rasmussen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camilla Ikast OttosenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Section 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 10, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. Camilla.ikast.ottosen@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-6216
Jacob SteinmetzDepartment of Anaesthesia, Section 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 10, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mo Haslund LarsenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Section 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 10, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Josefine S BaekgaardDepartment of Anaesthesia, Section 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 10, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars S RasmussenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Section 4231, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 10, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal immobilisation of blunt trauma victims with potential spinal cord injury is considered standard of care. The traditional management has, however, been increasingly questioned and concerns about harm have been raised. Few studies have described the perspective of the trauma patient regarding the spinal immobilisation. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the patient experience of immobilisation after trauma.

methodsWe prospectively screened adult trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre for eligibility. We included adult trauma patients who had been, and remembered being, immobilised for spinal protection with a cervical collar and a spine board prehospitally or upon arrival at the trauma centre. A semi-structured interview was conducted 2 to 72 h after admission either in person or by telephone.

resultsOne hundred and fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion based on the patient charts. Out of 98 patients assessed for participation, 48 (49%) had no memory of being immobilised. We thus included 50 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR: 26-60) of whom 38 (76%) were men. The median injury severity score was 9 (IQR: 3-15) and the median time with a cervical collar from initial application to in-hospital removal or until the interview was given was 91 min (IQR: 72-136). Nineteen patients (38%) reported discomfort and 12 patients (24%) experienced pain related to the immobilisation. Forty patients (80%) reported a sense of protection related to the immobilisation.

conclusionDiscomfort related to spinal immobilisation was reported in 38% of trauma patients. However, a sense of protection was a recurring theme in 80% of the trauma patients, who recalled being immobilised. Nearly half of the awake trauma patients had no memory of being immobilised.

Indexed as

AdultCervical VertebraeFemaleHumansImmobilizationInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedSpinal Cord InjuriesTrauma CentersWounds, Nonpenetrating

Identifiers

PMID31331379
PMCPMC6647237
OpenAlexW2964223580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.