Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331366›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.

Anna Lechner, Jan Kottner, Susanne Coleman, Delia Muir, Heather Bagley, Dimitri Beeckman, Wendy Chaboyer, Janet Cuddigan, Zena Moore, Claudia Rutherford and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Anna LechnerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. anna.lechner@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-9314
Jan KottnerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne ColemanInstitute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Delia MuirInstitute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Heather BagleyClinical Trials Research Centre (CTRC), North West Hub for Trials Methodology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Dimitri BeeckmanUniversity Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendy ChaboyerSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University and Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Qld, Australia.
Janet CuddiganCollege of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Zena MooreRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Claudia RutherfordFaculty of Science, Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jochen SchmittCentre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jane NixonInstitute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Katrin BalzerInstitute of Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEClinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science · DEGhent University · BEGriffith University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCore outcome sets (COS) are being developed in many clinical areas to increase the quality and comparability of clinical trial results as well as to ensure their relevance for patients. A COS represents an agreed standardized set of outcomes that describes the minimum that should be consistently reported in all clinical trials of a defined area. It comprises a core domain set (defining what core outcomes should be measured) and a core measurement set (defining measurement/assessment instruments for each core domain). For pressure ulcer prevention trials a COS is lacking. The great heterogeneity of reported outcomes in this field indicates the need for a COS. METHODS/

designThe first part of this project aims to develop a core domain set by following established methods, which incorporates four steps: (1) definition of the scope, (2) conducting a scoping review, (3) organizing facilitated workshops with service users, (4) performing Delphi surveys and establishing consensus in a face-to-face meeting with different stakeholders. DISCUSSION: After achieving consensus on the core domain set, further work will be undertaken to determine a corresponding core measurement set. This will lead to better pressure ulcer prevention research in the future. There are a number of methodological challenges in the field of COS development. To meet these challenges and to ensure a high-quality COS, the OUTPUTS project affiliates to current standards and works in close collaboration with international experts and with existing international service user groups.

trial registrationThe OUTPUTs project is registered in the COMET database: ( http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/283 ). Registered on 2015.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationPressure UlcerResearch DesignConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansTreatment OutcomeClinical trialCore domain setCore outcome setDelphiDermatologyPatient reported outcomePressure ulcerPreventionScoping reviewService user involvement

Identifiers

PMID31331366
PMCPMC6647312
OpenAlexW2963582213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.