Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331362›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2019

A consensus conference report on defining the eligibility criteria for pediatric palliative care in Italy.

Momcilo Jankovic, Lucia De Zen, Federico Pellegatta, Pierina Lazzarin, Marina Bertolotti, Luca Manfredini, Antonino Aprea, Luigi Memo, Antonio Del Vecchio, Rino Agostiniani and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pediatric Oncology Hospice: A Comprehensive Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Momcilo JankovicClinica Pediatrica, Università degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, Fondazione MBBM, ASST, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy. m.jankovic@asst-monza.it.
Lucia De ZenAssistenza domiciliare e Cure palliative pediatriche AAS5 Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy.
Federico PellegattaClinica Pediatrica, Università degli Studi Milano-Bicocca, Fondazione MBBM, ASST, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Pierina LazzarinCentro Regionale Veneto di Terapia del Dolore e Cure Palliative Pediatriche, Dipartimento della Salute della Donna e del bambino, Università di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Marina BertolottiServizio di Psiconcologia Pediatrica, SC Oncoematologia e Centro Trapianti, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Luca ManfrediniCentro Regionale Ligure di Terapia del Dolore e Cure Palliative Pediatriche, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Antonino ApreaCentro Specialistico di Psicologia Sanitaria e Ospedaliera, Consulente Associazione Genitin Onlus - Policlinico Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Luigi MemoUOC Pediatria, Ospedale San Martino, Belluno, Italy.
Antonio Del VecchioUOC Terapia Intensiva Neonatale - Neonatologia, Ospedale "Di Venere", Bari, Italy.
Rino AgostinianiUO Pediatria e Patologia Neonatale, Area Funzionale Materno Infantile, Ospedale San Jacopo, Pistoia, Italy.
Franca BeniniServizio di Psiconcologia Pediatrica, SC Oncoematologia e Centro Trapianti, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe definition of the eligibility criteria of newborn, infant, child, or adolescent patients for palliative care (PC) is complicated by the fact that these patients generally present with very specific case histories that make it inadvisable to directly adopt existing PC protocols devised for adult patients. Thus, the goal of this paper is to define a standard set of criteria for establishing pediatric palliative care (PPC) eligibility.

methodsThe method adopted was that of the consensus conference. According to the guidelines issued by the Higher Institute of Health, the Board of the Italian Society for Palliative Care (i.e. steering committee) appointed a multidisciplinary group of eight health care professionals (i.e. doctors, nurses and psychologists) who worked from May 2014 to February 2016 to reach a consensus over PPC eligibility. This panel of relevant experts redacted a report summarizing all available scientific information concerning PPC, which was then submitted to the attention of a multidisciplinary jury composed of specialists and non-specialists of the field. The document thus produced was subsequently reviewed by an extended team of experts.

resultsThe consensus conference drafted a final document determining the guidelines for PPC eligibility of newborns, infants, children, and adolescents suffering from either oncological or non-oncological diseases.

conclusionsThis report provides health care providers with practical guidelines on how to define the eligibility of pediatric patients for PPC. Given the current situation in Italy, these guidelines will be instrumental in assisting the implementation of adequate generalist and specialist PPC services as well as in helping policymakers draft and implement national legislation pertaining to PPC.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePatient SelectionHumansItalyPediatricsConsensusEligibility criteriaIncurabilityPPC

Identifiers

PMID31331362
PMCPMC6647298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.