Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331310›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

The impact of a fellow-driven debriefing program after pediatric cardiac arrests.

Jennifer Gillen, Monica L Koncicki, Rebecca F Hough, Kathryn Palumbo, Tarif Choudhury, Ariel Daube, Anita Patel, Amy Chirico, Cheryl Lin, Sirisha Yalamanchi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Fellows on Postresuscitation Debriefing.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jennifer GillenNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Monica L KoncickiNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca F HoughDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kathryn PalumboNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Tarif ChoudhuryDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ariel DaubeNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Anita PatelNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Amy ChiricoNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Cheryl LinNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Sirisha YalamanchiNewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Linda Aponte-PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anita I SenDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. ais13@columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, post-cardiac arrest debriefing has increased, but historically it has occurred rarely in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A fellow-led debriefing tool was developed as a tool for fellow development, as well as to enhance communication amongst a multidisciplinary team.

methodsA curriculum and debriefing tool for fellow facilitators was developed and introduced in a 41-bed cardiac and medical PICU. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were sent to multidisciplinary PICU providers to assess effectiveness of debriefings using newly-trained leaders, as well as changes in team communication.

resultsDebriefing occurred after 84% (63/75) of cardiac arrests post-intervention. Providers in various team roles participated in pre-intervention (129 respondents/236 invitations) and post-intervention (96 respondents /232 invitations) surveys. Providers reported that frequently occurring debriefings increased from 9 to 58%, pre- and post-intervention respectively (p < .0001). Providers reported frequent identification and discussion of learning points increased from 32% pre- to 63% post-intervention. In the 12 months post-intervention, 62% of providers agreed that the overall quality of communication during arrests had improved, and 61% would be more likely to request a debriefing after cardiac arrest.

conclusionThe introduction of a fellow-led debriefing tool resulted in regularly performed debriefings after arrests. Despite post-intervention debriefings being led by newly-trained facilitators, the majority of PICU staff expressed satisfaction with the quality of debriefing and improvement in communication during arrests, suggesting that fellow facilitators can be effective debrief leaders.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFormative FeedbackInterprofessional RelationsPeer GroupChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart ArrestHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePatient Care TeamQuality ImprovementUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31331310
PMCPMC6647321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.