ArticleBMC women's health2019
How gender and religion impact uptake of family planning: results from a qualitative study in Northwestern Tanzania.
Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unmet need for family planning among reproductive-age women living with HIV in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Perspectives of religious beliefs and family planning by religious leaders and young women: results from a qualitative study of Bobo-Dioulasso and Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Family planning utilization among people living with HIV: a cross-sectional study at the Kumasi South Hospital, Ghana.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Article
- Understanding decision-making around human and livestock health in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic literature review.Dialogues in health · 2025Review
- Long-term perspectives of Muslim and Christian religious leaders on an educational intervention about family planning in Tanzania.Global public health · 2025Article
- Describing the roles of civil society organizations in sustaining adolescents' family planning programs in nine Asian and African countries.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Review
- Pooled prevalence of modern contraceptive utilization and its associated factors among reproductive age women in East Africa: derived from demographic and health surveys.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Prevalence and determinants of contraceptive use among men in Tanzania: Analysis of the 2022 demographic and health survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Nurturing hope in Rwandan healthcare settings: Exploring factors that influence hope among healthcare providers, pregnant women, and mothers with children under five years.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Overcoming structural violence through community-based safe-spaces: Qualitative insights from young women on oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Kisumu, Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Examination of adolescent and youth modern contraceptive users' perceptions on how religion influences contraceptive use and their rationale and circumstances of use: qualitative evidence from Burkina Faso, Kenya and Niger.Journal of population research (Canberra, A.C.T.) · 2025Article
- "Everyone has their own problems and realities so the religious community cannot judge someone." Contraception motivations and perceived consequences among young contraceptive users who practice a religion in Burkina Faso.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Association between women's empowerment and demand for family planning satisfied among Christians and Muslims in multireligious African countries.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Who is most vulnerable? Factors associated with presenting to antenatal care without a male partner in Northern Tanzania.Midwifery · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Intimate partner violence influences modern family planning use among married women in Tanzania: cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen in Tanzania report a high unmet need for both information about and access to family planning. Prior studies have demonstrated the complex and variable relationship between religious faith and beliefs about family planning in sub-Saharan Africa. We hypothesized that a major reason for the poor uptake of family planning in Tanzania is that women and their partners are uncertain about whether pregnancy prevention is compatible with their religious beliefs.
methodsTwenty-four focus group discussions with 206 participants were conducted in Mwanza, Tanzania between 2016 and 2017: six groups were conducted among Christian men, six among Christian women, six among Muslim men, and six among Muslim women. Among Christians, 98% were Protestants. Focus groups were also divided by gender and religion to facilitate discussion about gender-specific and religion-specific factors influencing family planning utilization. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic, phenomenological approach.
resultsWe identify two important themes regarding the intersections of religion and family planning practices. First, we report that dynamics of family planning are experienced differently based on gender, and that male authority conflicts with female embodied knowledge, leading to negotiation or covert contraceptive use. Second, religious acceptability of family planning methods is of central importance, though participants differed in their interpretations of their religion's stance on this question. Most who found family planning incompatible with their faith affirmed their responsibility to give birth to as many children as God would give them. Others found family planning to be acceptable given their moral responsibility to care for and protect their children by limiting the family size.
conclusionsBoth religious tradition and gender dynamics strongly influence the uptake of family planning, with a wide range of interpretations of religious traditions affecting the perceived acceptability of family planning. Regardless of gender or religious affiliation, participants were unified by a desire to live according to religious tradition. Future efforts to improve uptake of family planning are likely to have maximal impact if they are tailored to inform, involve, and empower male heads of households, and to address questions of religious acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.