Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331290›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Pea genomic selection for Italian environments.

Paolo Annicchiarico, Nelson Nazzicari, Luciano Pecetti, Massimo Romani, Luigi Russi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic prediction for rust resistance in pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paolo AnnicchiaricoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy. paolo.annicchiarico@crea.gov.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-1035
Nelson NazzicariCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Luciano PecettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Massimo RomaniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Animal Production and Aquaculture, viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Luigi RussiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali Projects COBRA, REFORMA and ZooBio2systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA thorough verification of the ability of genomic selection (GS) to predict estimated breeding values for pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yield is pending. Prediction for different environments (inter-environment prediction) has key importance when breeding for target environments featuring high genotype × environment interaction (GEI). The interest of GS would increase if it could display acceptable prediction accuracies in different environments also for germplasm that was not used in model training (inter-population prediction).

resultsSome 306 genotypes belonging to three connected RIL populations derived from paired crosses between elite cultivars were genotyped through genotyping-by-sequencing and phenotyped for grain yield, onset of flowering, lodging susceptibility, seed weight and winter plant survival in three autumn-sown environments of northern or central Italy. The large GEI for grain yield and its pattern (implying larger variation across years than sites mainly due to year-to-year variability for low winter temperatures) encouraged the breeding for wide adaptation. Wider within-population than between-population variation was observed for nearly all traits, supporting GS application to many lines of relatively few elite RIL populations. Bayesian Lasso without structure imputation and 1% maximum genotype missing rate (including 6058 polymorphic SNP markers) was selected for GS modelling after assessing different GS models and data configurations. On average, inter-environment predictive ability using intra-population predictions reached 0.30 for yield, 0.65 for onset of flowering, 0.64 for seed weight, and 0.28 for lodging susceptibility. Using inter-population instead of intra-population predictions reduced the inter-environment predictive ability to 0.19 for grain yield, 0.40 for onset of flowering, 0.28 for seed weight, and 0.22 for lodging susceptibility. A comparison of GS vs phenotypic selection (PS) based on predicted genetic gains per unit time for same selection costs suggested greater efficiency of GS for all traits under various selection scenarios. For yield, the advantage in predicted efficiency of GS over PS was at least 80% using intra-population predictions and 20% using inter-population predictions. A genome-wide association study confirmed the highly polygenic control of most traits.

conclusionsGenome-enabled predictions can increase the efficiency of pea line selection for wide adaptation to Italian environments relative to phenotypic selection.

Indexed as

BreedingEnvironmentGenomicsGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeItalyPhenotypePisum sativumBreeding valueCross-population predictionGenotype × environment interactionGenotyping-by-sequencingPisum sativumPredictive abilityYield

Identifiers

PMID31331290
PMCPMC6647272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.