ArticleBMC genomics2019
Pea genomic selection for Italian environments.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Pea-Ascochyta Blight Interaction and Its Implications for Pea Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genetic and molecular breeding perspectives on developing abiotic stress tolerant pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genomic prediction for grain yield and biotic stress resistance in field pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genetic and molecular approaches for Fusarium wilt resistance in garden pea: advances and future outlook.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- Genomic Selection for Pea Grain Yield and Protein Content in Italian Environments for Target and Non-Target Genetic Bases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Comparison of phenotypic selection of inbred lines, genomic selection of inbred lines, and evolutionary populations for field pea breeding in three Mediterranean regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Multi-trait multi-environment genomic prediction of preliminary yield trial in pulse crop.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Frost tolerance improvement in pea and white lupin by a high-throughput phenotyping platform.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genomic prediction for rust resistance in pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and grain protein concentration in durum wheat by using association tests and weighted GBLUP.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- An experimental dataset on yields of pulses across Europe.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Genome-wide association study as a powerful tool for dissecting competitive traits in legumes.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Genomic prediction and allele mining of agronomic and morphological traits in pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genomic selection for target traits in the Australian lentil breeding program.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Multi-trait genomic prediction improves selection accuracy for enhancing seed mineral concentrations in pea.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Genetic Augmentation of Legume Crops Using Genomic Resources and Genotyping Platforms for Nutritional Food Security.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Combining NDVI and Bacterial Blight Score to Predict Grain Yield in Field Pea.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Shared and tailored common bean transcriptomic responses to combined fusarium wilt and water deficit.Horticulture research · 2021Article
- Legume Breeding for the Agroecological Transition of Global Agri-Food Systems: A European Perspective.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Pea Breeding for Intercropping With Cereals: Variation for Competitive Ability and Associated Traits, and Assessment of Phenotypic and Genomic Selection Strategies.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA thorough verification of the ability of genomic selection (GS) to predict estimated breeding values for pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yield is pending. Prediction for different environments (inter-environment prediction) has key importance when breeding for target environments featuring high genotype × environment interaction (GEI). The interest of GS would increase if it could display acceptable prediction accuracies in different environments also for germplasm that was not used in model training (inter-population prediction).
resultsSome 306 genotypes belonging to three connected RIL populations derived from paired crosses between elite cultivars were genotyped through genotyping-by-sequencing and phenotyped for grain yield, onset of flowering, lodging susceptibility, seed weight and winter plant survival in three autumn-sown environments of northern or central Italy. The large GEI for grain yield and its pattern (implying larger variation across years than sites mainly due to year-to-year variability for low winter temperatures) encouraged the breeding for wide adaptation. Wider within-population than between-population variation was observed for nearly all traits, supporting GS application to many lines of relatively few elite RIL populations. Bayesian Lasso without structure imputation and 1% maximum genotype missing rate (including 6058 polymorphic SNP markers) was selected for GS modelling after assessing different GS models and data configurations. On average, inter-environment predictive ability using intra-population predictions reached 0.30 for yield, 0.65 for onset of flowering, 0.64 for seed weight, and 0.28 for lodging susceptibility. Using inter-population instead of intra-population predictions reduced the inter-environment predictive ability to 0.19 for grain yield, 0.40 for onset of flowering, 0.28 for seed weight, and 0.22 for lodging susceptibility. A comparison of GS vs phenotypic selection (PS) based on predicted genetic gains per unit time for same selection costs suggested greater efficiency of GS for all traits under various selection scenarios. For yield, the advantage in predicted efficiency of GS over PS was at least 80% using intra-population predictions and 20% using inter-population predictions. A genome-wide association study confirmed the highly polygenic control of most traits.
conclusionsGenome-enabled predictions can increase the efficiency of pea line selection for wide adaptation to Italian environments relative to phenotypic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.