Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331038›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Epidermal Growth Factor is Effective in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Thien Quoc Bui, Quoc Van Phu Bui, Dávid Németh, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Szakács, Zoltán Rumbus, Barbara Tóth, Gabriella Emri, Andrea Párniczky, Patricia Sarlós and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Poloxamer-based hydrogel with EGCG and rhEGF for diabetic foot ulcer treatment.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thien Quoc BuiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary. buiquocthien1996@gmail.com.
Quoc Van Phu BuiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh city 70000, Vietnam.
Dávid NémethInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt SzakácsInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-941X
Zoltán RumbusInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Barbara TóthDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Gabriella EmriDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Andrea PárniczkyHeim Pál National Institute of Pediatrics, 1089 Budapest, Hungary.
Patricia SarlósDivision of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Orsolya VargaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HUHeim Pál Országos Gyermekgyógyászati Intézet · HUPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are one the common complications of diabetes mellitus. Many trials were performed to evaluate the effect of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) in healing DFUs. This meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the evidence of rhEGF treatment in DFUs in comparison to placebo. Databases included for the search were PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, and Scopus (up to January 2019). The outcome of interest was the complete healing rate of DFUs. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of administration route (intralesional injection and topical apply) by calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of six studies involving 530 patients were eligible for analysis. The combined OR (intralesional injection and topical apply) was 4.005 (95% CI: (2.248; 7.135),

Indexed as

Diabetic FootEpidermal Growth FactorHumansOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsWound HealingEpidermal Growth FactorRecombinant Proteinsdiabetic foot ulcerdiabetic mellitusmeta-analysisplaceborecombinant human epidermal growth factor

Identifiers

PMID31331038
PMCPMC6678975
OpenAlexW2963456904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.