Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31331016›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Recent Updates on Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (MI-RADS) for Theranostic Radiotracers-Navigating Pitfalls of SSTR- and PSMA-Targeted PET/CT.

Rudolf A Werner, James T Thackeray, Martin G Pomper, Frank M Bengel, Michael A Gorin, Thorsten Derlin, Steven P Rowe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. On the Way for Patients with Prostate Cancer to the Best Use of PSMA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. PSMA PET-CT: the winner takes it all.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  5. Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rudolf A WernerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
James T ThackerayDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Martin G PomperJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Frank M BengelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Michael A GorinJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Thorsten DerlinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Steven P RoweJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. srowe8@jhmi.edu.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Training/Dissemination-Resource for Molecular Imaging Agents in Precision MedicineP41EB024495 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARTIN G POMPER · 2017 to 2026
$11.8M
PSMA-based Cancer Imaging AgentsR01CA134675 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2009 to 2025
$6.2M
Small Molecule PSMA-Targeted Alpha TherapyR01CA184228 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G, ZALUTSKY, MICHAEL ROD · 2014 to 2023
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134675NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184228NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB024495NIH HHS CA134675, CA183031, CA184228, EB024495Prostate Cancer Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The theranostic concept represents a paradigmatic example of personalized treatment. It is based on the use of radiolabeled compounds which can be applied for both diagnostic molecular imaging and subsequent treatment, using different radionuclides for labelling. Clinically relevant examples include somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NET), as well as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging and therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer (PC). As such, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy using positron emission tomography (PET). While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography scans, the reader has to navigate certain pitfalls, including (I.) varying normal biodistribution between different PSMA- and SSTR-targeting PET radiotracers, (II.) varying radiotracer uptake in numerous kinds of both benign and malignant lesions, and (III.) resulting false-positive and false-negative findings. Thus, two novel reporting and data system (RADS) classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS) have been recently introduced under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS). Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e., if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied. Learning objectives of the present case-based review are as follows: (I.) the theranostic concept for the treatment of NET and PC will be briefly introduced, (II.) the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT will be identified, (III.) the novel framework system for theranostic radiotracers (MI-RADS) will be explained, applied to complex clinical cases and recent studies in the field will be highlighted. Finally, current treatment strategies based on MI-RADS will be proposed, which will demonstrate how such a generalizable framework system truly paves the way for clinically meaningful molecular imaging-guided treatment of either PC or NET. Thus, beyond an introduction of MI-RADS, the present review aims to provide an update of recently published studies which have further validated the concept of structured reporting systems in the field of theranostics.

Indexed as

molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS)NETneuroendocrine tumorsPETpositron emission tomographyprostate carcinomaprostate-specific membrane antigenPSMAPSMA-RADSRADSreporting and data systemsomatostatin receptorSSTRSSTR-RADStheragnosticstheranostics

Identifiers

PMID31331016
PMCPMC6678732
OpenAlexW2963715263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.