Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31330995›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Assessment of a Voluntary Non-Profit Health Insurance Scheme for Migrants along the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Case Study of the Migrant Fund in Thailand.

Nareerut Pudpong, Nicolas Durier, Sataporn Julchoo, Pigunkaew Sainam, Beena Kuttiparambil, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Systematic Scoping Review on Migrant Health Coverage in Thailand.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Progress towards Health for All: Time to End Discrimination and Marginalization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nareerut PudpongInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), the Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand. nareerut@ihpp.thaigov.net.
Nicolas DurierDreamlopments Ltd., Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Sataporn JulchooInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), the Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Pigunkaew SainamInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), the Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Beena KuttiparambilUNICEF Thailand Country Office, Bangkok 10200, Thailand.
Rapeepong SuphanchaimatInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), the Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to health care and financial protection for migrants can be promoted through diverse health insurance schemes, designed to suit migrants' needs within a specific context. The Migrant Fund (M-Fund) is a voluntary, non-profit health insurance scheme operating along the Thai-Myanmar border in Thailand since 2017 and aims to protect the health of migrants uncovered by existing government insurance schemes. A qualitative evaluation was conducted between December 2018 and March 2019 to determine M-Fund's operational impacts, provide recommendations for improvement, and draw suggestions about its role in protecting migrant health. In-depth interviews with 20 individuals and 5 groups were conducted in three categories: (1) International, national, and local partners; (2) M-Fund clients; and (3) M-Fund staff. Interview information was triangulated with findings from other informants, a document review, and researchers' observations. Despite covering a small number of 9131 migrants, the M-Fund has contributed to improving access to care for migrants, raised awareness about migrant health protection, and reduced the financial burden for public hospitals. The M-Fund acts as a safety-net initiative for those left behind due to unclear government policy to protect the health of undocumented/illegal migrants. Despite clear merits, the issue of adverse selection to the scheme is a critical challenge. Evidence from this evaluation is useful to inform the future design of government insurance schemes for migrants.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsFinancial ManagementHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance, HealthMyanmarThailandhealth insurancehealth protectionillegal migrantM-FundmigrantMigrant Fundmigrant healthundocumented migrant

Identifiers

PMID31330995
PMCPMC6678165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.