ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics2019
Predictive models of protease specificity based on quantitative protease-activity profiling data.
Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bioinformatics-based prediction of protease substrates can help to elucidate regulatory proteolytic pathways that control a broad range of biological processes such as apoptosis and blood coagulation. The majority of published predictive models are position weight matrices (PWM) reflecting specificity of proteases toward target sequence. These models are typically derived from experimental data on positions of hydrolyzed peptide bonds and show a reasonable predictive power. New emerging techniques that not only register the cleavage position but also measure catalytic efficiency of proteolysis are expected to improve the quality of predictions or at least substantially reduce the number of tested substrates required for confident predictions. The main goal of this study was to develop new prediction models based on such data and to estimate the performance of the constructed models. We used data on catalytic efficiency of proteolysis measured for eight major human matrix metalloproteinases to construct predictive models of protease specificity using a variety of regression analysis techniques. The obtained results suggest that efficiency-based (quantitative) models show a comparable performance with conventional PWM-based algorithms, while less training data are required. The derived list of candidate cleavage sites in human secreted proteins may serve as a starting point for experimental analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.