Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31330184›Full record

ArticleAnaerobe2020

Development of a rapid-viability PCR method for detection of Clostridioides difficile spores from environmental samples.

Alicia M Shams, Laura J Rose, Judith A Noble-Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaerobe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimized Surveillance Testing for ToxigenicmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Culture-based viability PCR: strategies to harness sensitivity and minimize false positives.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unlocking the molecular realm: advanced approaches for identifying clinically and environmentally relevant bacteria.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alicia M ShamsDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton RD NE, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. Electronic address: AShams@cdc.gov.
Laura J RoseDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton RD NE, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.
Judith A Noble-WangDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton RD NE, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile is a common pathogen that is well known to survive for extended periods of time on environmental healthcare surfaces from fecal contamination. During epidemiological investigations of healthcare-associated infections, it is important to be able to detect whether or not there are viable spores of C. difficile on surfaces. Current methods to detect C. difficile can take up to 7 days for culture and in the case of detection by PCR, viability of the spores cannot be ascertained. Prevention of C. difficile infection in healthcare settings includes adequate cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces which increases the likelihood of detecting dead organisms from an environmental sample during an investigation. In this study, we were able to adapt a rapid-viability PCR (RV-PCR) method, first developed for detection of viable Bacillus anthracis spores, for the detection of viable C. difficile spores. RV-PCR uses the change in cycle threshold after incubation to confirm the presence of live organisms. Using this modified method we were able to detect viable C. difficile after 22 h of anaerobic incubation in Cycloserine Cefoxitin Fructose Broth (CCFB). This method also used bead beating combined with the Maxwell 16 Casework kit for DNA extraction and purification and a real-time duplex PCR assay for toxin B and cdd3 genes to confirm the identity of the C. difficile spores. Spiked environmental sponge-wipes with and without added organic load were tested to determine the limit of detection (LOD). The LOD from spiked environmental sponge-wipe samples was 10

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileGenes, BacterialSensitivity and SpecificitySpores, BacterialBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileEnvironmental samplingRapid viability PCRSpores

Identifiers

PMID31330184
PMCPMC7869797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.