Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329639›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Effects of two-dose ceftiofur treatment for metritis on the temporal dynamics of antimicrobial resistance among fecal Escherichia coli in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.

Ethan A Taylor, Ellen R Jordan, Jose A Garcia, Gerrit R Hagevoort, Keri N Norman, Sara D Lawhon, Juan M Piñeiro, Harvey M Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-read sequencing revealed cooccurrence, host range, and potential mobility of antibiotic resistome in cow feces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ethan A TaylorDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Ellen R JordanDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Jose A GarciaDepartment of Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Clovis, NM, United States of America.
Gerrit R HagevoortDepartment of Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Clovis, NM, United States of America.
Keri N NormanDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Sara D LawhonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Juan M PiñeiroDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, Amarillo, TX, United States of America.
Harvey M ScottDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0538-5961
Texas A&M University · USNew Mexico State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pair-matched longitudinal study conducted on three dairy farms in the U.S. High-Plains explored the temporal effects of two-dose ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) treatment for metritis on third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistance among enteric E. coli in Holstein-Friesian cows. The current 13-day slaughter withholding period does not account for rising populations of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant bacteria in feces of animals following CCFA treatment. A total of 124 matched-pairs of cows were enrolled in the study. Cows diagnosed with postpartum metritis received the product twice at the labeled dose of 6.6 mg/kg subcutaneously at the base of alternating ears. Untreated cows-absent clinical metritis-were matched on lactation number and calving date. Feces were collected per rectum on days 0 (baseline), 6, 16, 28, and 56. Environmental samples, from watering troughs as well as surface manure from fresh-cow, hospital, maternity, and milking pens, and from the compost pile were collected prior to the animal sample collection period. Historical data on metritis rates and CCFA use were compiled from herd records. On day 0, cows exhibited an overall mean difference of over 4 log10 colony forming units (CFU) comparing 3GC resistant E. coli to the general E. coli population. At the first eligible slaughter date, the difference declined to 3.31 log10 CFU among cows in the CCFA group (P<0.01 compared to control cows). Such differences were no longer observed between the treated and control groups by day 28. Results suggest a 13-day withholding period following the final treatment is insufficient to allow levels of 3GC resistant E. coli to return to baseline. This effect varied by farm and was dependent upon the starting level of resistance. A farm-specific extended slaughter-withholding period could reduce the microbial risk to food products at slaughter.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleCattle DiseasesCephalosporinsDrug Administration ScheduleEndometritisExtraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coliFemaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftiofurCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID31329639
PMCPMC6645674
OpenAlexW2963064180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.