Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329574›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Why do eukaryotic proteins contain more intrinsically disordered regions?

Walter Basile, Marco Salvatore, Claudio Bassot, Arne Elofsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prediction of Intrinsically Disordered Regions That Bind RNA with DisoRDPbind.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative assessment of binding residue predictions in intrinsically disordered regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of predictions of disordered binding regions in the CAID2 experiment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walter BasileScience for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-222X
Marco SalvatoreScience for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.
Claudio BassotScience for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-9028
Arne ElofssonScience for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7115-9751
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic disorder is more abundant in eukaryotic than prokaryotic proteins. Methods predicting intrinsic disorder are based on the amino acid sequence of a protein. Therefore, there must exist an underlying difference in the sequences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins causing the (predicted) difference in intrinsic disorder. By comparing proteins, from complete eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes, we show that the difference in intrinsic disorder emerges from the linker regions connecting Pfam domains. Eukaryotic proteins have more extended linker regions, and in addition, the eukaryotic linkers are significantly more disordered, 38% vs. 12-16% disordered residues. Next, we examined the underlying reason for the increase in disorder in eukaryotic linkers, and we found that the changes in abundance of only three amino acids cause the increase. Eukaryotic proteins contain 8.6% serine; while prokaryotic proteins have 6.5%, eukaryotic proteins also contain 5.4% proline and 5.3% isoleucine compared with 4.0% proline and ≈ 7.5% isoleucine in the prokaryotes. All these three differences contribute to the increased disorder in eukaryotic proteins. It is tempting to speculate that the increase in serine frequencies in eukaryotes is related to regulation by kinases, but direct evidence for this is lacking. The differences are observed in all phyla, protein families, structural regions and type of protein but are most pronounced in disordered and linker regions. The observation that differences in the abundance of three amino acids cause the difference in disorder between eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins raises the question: Are amino acid frequencies different in eukaryotic linkers because the linkers are more disordered or do the differences cause the increased disorder?

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinEukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsIsoleucineProkaryotic CellsProlineProtein DomainsSelection, GeneticSerineAmino AcidsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsIsoleucineProlineSerine

Identifiers

PMID31329574
PMCPMC6675126
OpenAlexW2963102852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.