Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329364›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2019

The national blueprint for future factor VIII inhibitor clinical trials: NHLBI State of the Science (SOS) Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors.

Margaret V Ragni, Lindsey A George, Members of Working Group 1, the NHLBI State of the Science Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors: Generating a national blueprint for future research

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04303559 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Inhibitor Prevention Trial, Comparing Eloctate vs. Emicizumab to Prevent Inhibitor Formation in Severe Hemophilia A

TypeinterventionalSponsorMargaret RagniRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1ConditionsHemophilia A Without InhibitorArmsEloctate Injectable Product, Emicizumab Injection [Hemlibra]
NCT04303572 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase III Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Inhibitor Eradication Trial, Comparing Eloctate Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) Plus Emicizumab vs. Eloctate ITI Alone to Eradicate Inhibitor Formation in Severe Hemophilia A

TypeinterventionalSponsorMargaret RagniRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1ConditionsHemophilia A With InhibitorArmsEloctate ITI, Emicizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Hemophilia gene therapy: ushering in a new treatment paradigm?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Review
  4. Current Clinical Applications of In Vivo Gene Therapy with AAVs.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret V RagniUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-5379
Lindsey A GeorgeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Members of Working Group 1, the NHLBI State of the Science Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors: Generating a national blueprint for future research
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Therapeutic Applications of Factor VIIIa Inactivation in Hemophilia AK08HL146991 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI GEORGE, LINDSEY ALLISON · 2019 to 2023
$698k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL146991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhibitor formation is a major complication of haemophilia for which clinical trials are planned. Despite emerging novel haemostatic agents, challenges of rare disease trials are limited subjects and lack of an organized research organization with strategic resources and partnerships.

aimThe charge to Working Group 1 was to establish scientific priorities and innovative implementation strategies to conduct inhibitor prevention and eradication trials. To determine feasibility of trial design and strategic resources and partnerships to be leveraged, two clinical trial concepts were considered.

resultsFor the Inhibitor Prevention Trial, we considered adaptive design with early stopping rules, dynamic randomization and Master Protocol models to reduce sample size; and registries to provide concurrent controls and natural history data. For the Inhibitor Eradication Trial using gene therapy, an adaptive design was considered in a small number of subjects, and, if safe and meeting regulatory requirements, enrolment would be expanded. A Haemophilia Clinical Trials Group (HCTG) infrastructure was envisioned, with uniform procedures and standardized outcomes, data collection and assays, within which trial concepts would be developed, vetted and prioritized by a Steering Committee, and submitted to NIH and other research sponsors for review and funding. Mechanistic studies would be embedded within the trials, early stage investigators trained and mentored, and the research infrastructure established within the haemophilia centre (HTC) network and supported by partnerships with foundations, community, federal partners and industry.

conclusionThe success of inhibitor trials will depend on innovative trial design and an organized HCTG research infrastructure, leveraged through community partnerships.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEducationFactor VIIIGenetic TherapyHealth WorkforceHemophilia AHumansInventionsFactor VIIIclinical trialshaemophiliainherited bleeding disordersinhibitor formation

Identifiers

PMID31329364
PMCPMC9883697
OpenAlexW2964057985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.