ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2019
The national blueprint for future factor VIII inhibitor clinical trials: NHLBI State of the Science (SOS) Workshop on factor VIII inhibitors.
Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Inhibitor Prevention Trial, Comparing Eloctate vs. Emicizumab to Prevent Inhibitor Formation in Severe Hemophilia A
Phase III Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Inhibitor Eradication Trial, Comparing Eloctate Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) Plus Emicizumab vs. Eloctate ITI Alone to Eradicate Inhibitor Formation in Severe Hemophilia A
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities to transform the care of people with hemophilia.Expert review of hematology · 2023Article
- Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy for Hemophilia.Annual review of medicine · 2023Review
- Hemophilia gene therapy: ushering in a new treatment paradigm?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021Review
- Current Clinical Applications of In Vivo Gene Therapy with AAVs.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021Review
- The design of a Bayesian platform trial to prevent and eradicate inhibitors in patients with hemophilia.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2020Review
- Origins and organization of the NHLBI State of the Science Workshop: Generating a national blueprint for future research on factor VIII inhibitors.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInhibitor formation is a major complication of haemophilia for which clinical trials are planned. Despite emerging novel haemostatic agents, challenges of rare disease trials are limited subjects and lack of an organized research organization with strategic resources and partnerships.
aimThe charge to Working Group 1 was to establish scientific priorities and innovative implementation strategies to conduct inhibitor prevention and eradication trials. To determine feasibility of trial design and strategic resources and partnerships to be leveraged, two clinical trial concepts were considered.
resultsFor the Inhibitor Prevention Trial, we considered adaptive design with early stopping rules, dynamic randomization and Master Protocol models to reduce sample size; and registries to provide concurrent controls and natural history data. For the Inhibitor Eradication Trial using gene therapy, an adaptive design was considered in a small number of subjects, and, if safe and meeting regulatory requirements, enrolment would be expanded. A Haemophilia Clinical Trials Group (HCTG) infrastructure was envisioned, with uniform procedures and standardized outcomes, data collection and assays, within which trial concepts would be developed, vetted and prioritized by a Steering Committee, and submitted to NIH and other research sponsors for review and funding. Mechanistic studies would be embedded within the trials, early stage investigators trained and mentored, and the research infrastructure established within the haemophilia centre (HTC) network and supported by partnerships with foundations, community, federal partners and industry.
conclusionThe success of inhibitor trials will depend on innovative trial design and an organized HCTG research infrastructure, leveraged through community partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.