ArticleNMR in biomedicine2019
Magnetic Resonance Elastography of kidneys: SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and its comparison to GRE MRE.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of fat-suppression-related sequence operations for stiffness stability in spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography: a phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance elastography of the pediatric kidney: technical considerations and emerging clinical applications.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Association of In Vivo Kidney Stiffness Measured by Multifrequency MR Elastography and Long-Term Renal Function in Transplant Recipients and Living Donors.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Improving the Accuracy and Repeatability of Renal Stiffness Measurement With Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Influence of Vibration Frequency, Acquisition Orientation, and Postprocessing-A Phantom and Volunteer Study.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Nucleus pulposus structure and function assessed in shear using magnetic resonance elastography, quantitative MRI, and rheometry.JOR spine · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Computational Modeling Identify Heterogeneous Lung Biomechanical Properties during Cystic Fibrosis.Research square · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance elastography resolving all gross anatomical segments of the kidney during controlled hydration.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Abdominal MR elastography with multiple driver arrays: performance and repeatability.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- A diagnostic test of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography imaging for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in patients with T1 stage clear cell renal carcinoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Effects of kidney perfusion on renal stiffness and tissue fluidity measured with tomoelastography in an MRI-compatibleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Multiparametric quantitative renal MRI in children and young adults: comparison between healthy individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- MR Elastography of the Abdomen: Experimental Protocols.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is 1) to demonstrate reproducibility of spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to estimate kidney stiffness; and 2) to compare SE-EPI MRE and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE-derived stiffness estimations in various anatomical regions of the kidney. Kidney MRE was performed on 33 healthy subjects (8 for SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and 25 for comparison with GRE MRE; age range: 22-66 years) in a 3 T MRI scanner. To demonstrate SE-EPI MRE reproducibility, subjects were scanned for the first scan and then asked to leave the scan room and repositioned again for the second (repeat) scan. Similar set-up was used for GRE MRE as well. The displacement data was then processed to obtain overall stiffness estimates of the kidney. Concordance correlation analyses were performed to determine SE-EPI MRE reproducibility and agreement between GRE MRE and SE-EPI MRE derived stiffness. A high concordance correlation (ρ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.