Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329274›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2020

Application of the generalized matching law to chess openings: A gambit analysis.

Ian Cero, John Michael Falligant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Undermatching Is a Consequence of Policy Compression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  3. ScalingPerspectives on behavior science · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian CeroAuburn University.
John Michael FalligantAuburn University.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Suicide Prevention Research (supplement 2)T32MH020061 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VAN ORDEN, KIMBERLY ALLISON · 2001 to 2025
$5.9M
NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH120727NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the opening moves of a chess game, a player (typically White) may offer a number of gambits, which involve sacrificing a chess piece for an opponent for capture to achieve long-term positional advantages. One of the most popular gambits is called the Queen's Gambit and involves White offering a pawn to Black, which will open a lane for White's Queen if accepted by Black. In the present study, the generalized matching law (GML) was applied to chess openings involving the Queen's Gambit using over 71,000 archived chess games. Overall, chess players' opening moves involving the Queen's Gambit exhibited orderly matching as predicted by the GML, and the GML accounted for more variance in players' chess decision making as their relative playing experience increased. This study provides support for the generality of the GML and its application to complex operant behavior outside of laboratory contexts.

Indexed as

Games, RecreationalHumansRecreationchesschoicedecision-makinggeneralized matching law

Identifiers

PMID31329274
PMCPMC7061917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.