Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329248›Full record

SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

GSMA: an approach to identify robust global and test Gene Signatures using Meta-Analysis.

Adib Shafi, Tin Nguyen, Azam Peyvandipour, Sorin Draghici

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genes · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Protein structure-based gene expression signatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adib ShafiDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Azam PeyvandipourDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Sorin DraghiciDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Wayne State University · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Serine/threonine Protein Phosphatase 1 in Insulin resistance and Type 2 DiabetesR01DK107666 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YI, ZHENGPING · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK107666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRecent advances in biomedical research have made massive amount of transcriptomic data available in public repositories from different sources. Due to the heterogeneity present in the individual experiments, identifying reproducible biomarkers for a given disease from multiple independent studies has become a major challenge. The widely used meta-analysis approaches, such as Fisher's method, Stouffer's method, minP and maxP, have at least two major limitations: (i) they are sensitive to outliers, and (ii) they perform only one statistical test for each individual study, and hence do not fully utilize the potential sample size to gain statistical power.

resultsHere, we propose a gene-level meta-analysis framework that overcomes these limitations and identifies a gene signature that is reliable and reproducible across multiple independent studies of a given disease. The approach provides a comprehensive global signature that can be used to understand the underlying biological phenomena, and a smaller test signature that can be used to classify future samples of a given disease. We demonstrate the utility of the framework by constructing disease signatures for influenza and Alzheimer's disease using nine datasets including 1108 individuals. These signatures are then validated on 12 independent datasets including 912 individuals. The results indicate that the proposed approach performs better than the majority of the existing meta-analysis approaches in terms of both sensitivity as well as specificity. The proposed signatures could be further used in diagnosis, prognosis and identification of therapeutic targets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeBiomarkersHumansSample SizeSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31329248
PMCPMC7869776
OpenAlexW2963127739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.