Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31329228›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Hybrid Genome Assembly of a Neotropical Mutualistic Ant.

Juliane Hartke, Tilman Schell, Evelien Jongepier, Hanno Schmidt, Philipp P Sprenger, Juraj Paule, Erich Bornberg-Bauer, Thomas Schmitt, Florian Menzel, Markus Pfenninger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliane HartkeSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tilman SchellLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Evelien JongepierMolecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
Hanno SchmidtVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis.
Philipp P SprengerInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iOME), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Juraj PauleDepartment of Botany and Molecular Evolution, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Erich Bornberg-BauerMolecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.
Thomas SchmittDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Biocentre - Am Hubland, Germany.
Florian MenzelInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iOME), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Markus PfenningerSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Barbara FeldmeyerSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Münster · DELOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics · DESenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre · DESenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M · DEUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of social insects is largely intertwined with their highly advanced chemical communication system that facilitates recognition and discrimination of species and nest-mates, recruitment, and division of labor. Hydrocarbons, which cover the cuticle of insects, not only serve as waterproofing agents but also constitute a major component of this communication system. Two cryptic Crematogaster species, which share their nest with Camponotus ants, show striking diversity in their cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile. This mutualistic system therefore offers a great opportunity to study the genetic basis of CHC divergence between sister species. As a basis for further genome-wide studies high-quality genomes are needed. Here, we present the annotated draft genome for Crematogaster levior A. By combining the three most commonly used sequencing techniques-Illumina, PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore-we constructed a high-quality de novo ant genome. We show that even low coverage of long reads can add significantly to overall genome contiguity. Annotation of desaturase and elongase genes, which play a role in CHC biosynthesis revealed one of the largest repertoires in ants and a higher number of desaturases in general than in other Hymenoptera. This may provide a mechanistic explanation for the high diversity observed in C. levior CHC profiles.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, InsectSymbiosisAnimalsAntsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHydrocarbonsInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilySpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeHydrocarbonsInsect Proteinsassemblycuticular hydrocarbonsdesaturaseelongaseformicineMinION

Identifiers

PMID31329228
PMCPMC6735702
OpenAlexW2966311179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.