ArticleAJOB neuroscience
Neuroethics at 15: The Current and Future Environment for Neuroethics.
Article in AJOB neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is the Treatment Worse than the Disease?: Key Stakeholders' Views about the Use of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Neuroethics · 2025Article
- East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- Ethical issues in direct-to-consumer healthcare: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.AJOB empirical bioethics · 2024Article
- One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023Review
- Towards an understanding of global brain data governance: ethical positions that underpin global brain data governance discourse.Frontiers in big data · 2023Article
- The evolution of Big Data in neuroscience and neurology.Journal of big data · 2023Article
- Article
- Ethics of Digital Mental Health During COVID-19: Crisis and Opportunities.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- "They Are Invasive in Different Ways.": Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Invasiveness of Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
- Neuroethics at 15: Keep the Kant but Add More Bacon.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroethics research and scholarship intersect with dynamic academic disciplines in science, engineering, and the humanities. On the occasion of the 15th anniversary of the formation of the International Neuroethics Society, we identify current and future topics for neuroethics and discuss the many social and political challenges that emerge from the converging dynamics of neurotechnologies and artificial intelligence. We also highlight the need for a global, transdisciplinary, and integrated community of researchers to address the challenges that are precipitated by this rapid sociotechnological transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31329076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.