ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2019
Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Guideline
- Ascertaining the Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- An analysis of operating time over the years for robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology and gynecologic oncology.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- The 61st Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO).Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On the basis of emerging data and the current understanding of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for radical hysterectomy (RH) in women with cervical cancer, the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery support the following recommendations: According to the recently published phase III Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial-a prospective randomized clinical trial-disease-free survival and overall survival rates of MIS RH are significantly lower than those of open RH. Gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the emerging data on MIS RH for early-stage cervical cancer. The results of the LACC trial, together with institutional data, should be discussed with patients before choosing MIS RH. MIS RH should be performed for optimal candidates according to the current practice guidelines by gynecologic oncologists who are skilled at performing MIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.