Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328457›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2019

Overexpression of HER2/HER3 and clinical feature of ovarian cancer.

Ye Won Chung, Seongmin Kim, Jin Hwa Hong, Jae Kwan Lee, Nak Woo Lee, Young Seok Lee, Jae Yun Song

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ye Won Chung *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-6515
Seongmin Kim *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2541-8879
Jin Hwa HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-5363
Jae Kwan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-6403
Nak Woo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-7574
Young Seok LeeDepartment of Pathology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8606-2522
Jae Yun SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sjyuni105@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-5638
Korea University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Environment 2016001360007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHuman epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and 3 (HER3) belong to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases. In this study, we assessed HER2/HER3 expression levels in specimens of epithelial ovarian cancer and determined their correlation with clinical features of ovarian cancer.

methodsTissue microarrays (TMAs) were prepared from paraffin blocks of 105 ovarian tumour samples. HER2, HER3, PI3K, Akt, p-Akt, mTOR, p-mTOR, S6, and p-S6 expression levels were investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC).

resultsHER2 positivity was 3.8% by IHC and 5.7% by ISH, whereas that of HER3 was 12.4% and 8.6%, respectively. HER2 status by either IHC or ISH was not related to PFS (p=0.128, 0.168, respectively) and OS (p=0.245, 0.164, respectively). However, the HER3 status determined using fluorescence ISH was associated with poor PFS (p=0.035 on log rank test), which was a significant risk factor even after adjusting other possible risk factors in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio=2.377 [1.18-7.49], p=0.021). Expressions of Akt, p-mTOR, and S6 were also related with poor progression (p=0.008, 0.049, 0.014, respectively).

conclusionHER3 is possibly an independent marker for poor prognosis in individuals with ovarian cancer, as the HER3 signalling pathway is distinct from that of HER2. The possibility of targeted therapy for patients with

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisReceptor, ErbB-3Republic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTissue Array AnalysisERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptor, ErbB-3ImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationOvarian Cancer

Identifiers

PMID31328457
PMCPMC6658608
OpenAlexW2923297356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.