Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328445›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Strengthening the scale-up and uptake of effective interventions for sex workers for population impact in Zimbabwe.

Frances M Cowan, Sungai T Chabata, Sithembile Musemburi, Elizabeth Fearon, Calum Davey, Tendayi Ndori-Mharadze, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Valentina Cambiano, Richard Steen, Joanna Busza and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Frances M CowanDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-4422
Sungai T ChabataCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-7629-1543
Sithembile MusemburiCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0001-5971-8883
Elizabeth FearonDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-251X
Calum DaveyDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4283-3030
Tendayi Ndori-MharadzeCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research (CSHHAR) Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-978X
Loveleen Bansi-MatharuInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-7622
Valentina CambianoInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0700-105X
Richard SteenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0798-022X
Joanna BuszaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6334-0318
Raymond YekeyeNational AIDS Council, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Owen MugurungiAIDS and TB Directorate, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
James R HargreavesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-3572
Andrew N PhillipsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-4807
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWUniversity College London · GBErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZWNational AIDS Council · ZWUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1161329Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitGerman Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentUN Population FundUS Governments Key Population Challenge Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUNAIDS' goal of ending AIDS by 2030 is unreachable without better targeting of testing, prevention and care. Female sex workers (FSW) in Zimbabwe are at high risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. Here, we report on collated programme and research data from Zimbabwe's national sex work programme. We also assess the potential for wider population impact of FSW programmes by modelling the impact on HIV incidence of eliminating transmission through FSW (i.e. calculate the population attributable fraction of incidence attributable to sex work).

methodsDescriptive analyses of individual-level programme data collected from FSW between 2009 and June 2018 are triangulated with data collected through 37 respondent driven sampling surveys from 19 sites in Zimbabwe 2011 to 2017. We describe programme coverage, uptake, retention and patterns of sex work behaviour and gaps in service provision. An individual-level stochastic simulation model is used to reconstruct the epidemic and then the incidence compared with the counter-factual trend in incidence from 2010 had transmission through sex work been eliminated from that date.

resultsSisters has reached >67,000 FSW since 2009, increasing attendance as number of sites, programme staff and peer educators were increased. Over 57% of all FSW estimated to be working in Zimbabwe in 2017 (n = 40,000) attended the programme at least once. The proportion of young FSW reached has increased with introduction of the "Young Sisters programme." There are no clear differences in pattern of sex work across settings. Almost all women report condom use with clients at last sex (95%); however, consistent condom use with clients in the last month varies from 52% to 95% by site. Knowledge of HIV-positive status has increased from 48 to 78% between 2011 and 2016, as has prevalence of ART use among diagnosed women (29 to 67%). Although subject to uncertainty, modelling suggests that 70% (90% range: 32%, 93%) of all new infections in Zimbabwe from 2010 are directly or indirectly attributable to transmission via sex work.

conclusionsIt is feasible to increase coverage and impact of sex work programming through community-led scale-up of evidence-based interventions. Eliminating transmission through commercial sex would likely have a substantial impact on new infections occurring more widely across Zimbabwe.

Indexed as

Sex WorkersAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansSafe SexZimbabweAfricaHIV infectionHIV preventionHIV testingsex workersZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID31328445
PMCPMC6643097
OpenAlexW2963615929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.