Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328436›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

HIV prevention programme cascades: insights from HIV programme monitoring for female sex workers in Kenya.

Parinita Bhattacharjee, Helgar K Musyoki, Marissa Becker, Janet Musimbi, Shem Kaosa, Japheth Kioko, Sharmistha Mishra, Shajy K Isac, Stephen Moses, James F Blanchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parinita BhattacharjeeCentre for Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-7693
Helgar K MusyokiNational AIDS and STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marissa BeckerCentre for Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Janet MusimbiPartners for Health and Development in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shem KaosaPartners for Health and Development in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Japheth KiokoPartners for Health and Development in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sharmistha MishraDepartment of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shajy K IsacCentre for Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Stephen MosesCentre for Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
James F BlanchardCentre for Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) OPP-1032367Canada Research ChairCIHR FDN 13455Ontario HIV Treatment NetworkU.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) FHI 360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV prevention cascades have emerged as a programme management and monitoring tool that outlines the sequential steps of an HIV prevention programme. We describe the application of an HIV combination prevention programme cascade framework to monitor and improve HIV prevention interventions for female sex workers (FSWs) in Kenya.

methodsTwo data sources were analysed: (1) annual programme outcome surveys conducted using a polling booth survey methodology in 2017 among 4393 FSWs, and (2) routine programme monitoring data collected by (a) 92 implementing partners between July 2017 and June 2018, and (b) Learning Site in Mombasa (2014 to 2015) and Nairobi (2013). We present national, sub-national and implementing partner level cascades.

resultsAt the national level, the population size estimates for FSW were 133,675 while the programme coverage targets were 174,073. Programme targets as denominator, during the period 2017 to 2018, 156,220 (90%) FSWs received peer education and contact, 148,713 (85%) received condoms and 83,053 (48%) received condoms as per their estimated need. At the outcome level, 92% of FSWs used condoms at the last sex with their client but 73% reported consistent condom use. Although 96% of FSWs had ever tested for HIV, 85% had tested in the last three months. Seventy-nine per cent of the HIV-positive FSWs were enrolled in HIV care, 73% were currently enrolled on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 52% had attended an ART clinic in the last month. In the last six months, 48% of the FSWs had experienced police violence but 24% received violence support. National and sub-national level cascades showed proportions of FSWs lost at each step of programme implementation and variability in programme achievement. Hotspot and sub-population level cascades, presented as examples, demonstrate development and use of these cascades at the implementation level.

conclusionsHIV prevention programme cascades, drawing on multiple data sources to provide an understanding of gaps in programme outputs and outcomes, can provide powerful information for monitoring and improving HIV prevention programmes for FSWs at all levels of implementation and decision-making. Complexity of prevention programmes and the paucity of consistent data can pose a challenge to development of these cascades.

Indexed as

Sex WorkersAdultCondomsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyacascadeHIV preventionKenyakey populationmonitoring

Identifiers

PMID31328436
PMCPMC6643069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.