Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328428›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Resection of the primary tumor improves survival in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases: A SEER-based analysis.

Mengzhen Zheng, Yan Li, Tong Li, Lianfeng Zhang, Lin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influence of cancer-directed surgery on the prognosis of liver metastases from gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The clinical significance for primary tumor surgery in metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. [Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mengzhen ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-231X
Yan LiXinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Tong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lianfeng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lin ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81001103National Natural Science Foundation of China 81472325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients who suffer from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) often present with liver metastatic disease. The efficacy of primary tumor resection (PTR) for these patients remains controversial due to the relatively heterogeneous behavior of the primary tumor and the lack of clinical evidence. In this series, GEP-NEN patients with liver metastases (LM) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. A logistic regression model was used to analyze variables that were associated with PTR. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent prognostic risk factors. In total, 1547 patients were enrolled in our study, including 897 patients who underwent PTR. Resection of the primary tumor was associated with prolonged survival in all patients (5-year overall survival (OS) rates: 57.0% vs 15.4%, P < .001), and improved 5-year OS rates were observed in patients with gastric, small intestinal, colorectal, and pancreatic subtypes (39.7%, 73.3%, 24.6%, and 59.7%, respectively). On the multivariate analysis, PTR was an independent prognostic factor of prolonged OS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.39-0.59, P < .001). Patients with a young age (≤60 years), small intestinal or colorectal NENs, a large primary tumor, lymph node (LN) metastases, and high tumor differentiation were more likely to undergo PTR. However, patients with colorectal NENs or a large primary tumor (≥4 cm) were at an increased risk of death independently in the PTR subgroup. The risk factors for OS also included old age, gastric tumor location, and poor differentiation. In conclusion, although PTR prolonged OS in all GEP-NEN patients presenting with LM, surgical recipients should be considered carefully. Age, primary tumor site, size, and differentiation might help surgeons identify patients who could benefit from PTR.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDigestive System NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsKaplan-Meier EstimateLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsOdds RatioPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSEER Programliver metastasesneuroendocrine neoplasmsSEERsurvival

Identifiers

PMID31328428
PMCPMC6718577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.