Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31328354›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Trajectories of injection drug use among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada, 1996-2017: growth mixture modeling using data from prospective cohort studies.

Huiru Dong, Kanna Hayashi, Joel Singer, Michael John Milloy, Kora DeBeck, Evan Wood, Thomas Kerr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. National findings from the Tracks survey of people who inject drugs in Canada, Phase 4, 2017-2019.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huiru DongBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kanna HayashiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3843-2928
Joel SingerSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael John MilloyBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3821-6221
Kora DeBeckBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2045-1653
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Thomas KerrBritish Columbia Centre on Substance use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0870-7153

Funding

Vancouver Drug Users Study: The Impacts of Evolving Drug Use Patterns on HIV/AIDSU01DA038886 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI DEBECK, KORA, HAYASHI, KANNA · 2015 to 2024
$12.1M
Impacts of universal access to HIV/AIDS care among HIV+ injection drug usersU01DA021525 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MILLOY, M-J · 2017 to 2024
$4.3M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) 20R74326Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) MSH-141971Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA021525NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA038886St Paul's FoundationTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine and the CIHR Canadian Research Initiative SMN-139148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsInjection drug use patterns are known to change over time, although such long-term changes have not been well described. We sought to characterize longitudinal trajectories of injection drug use and identify associated factors.

designData were derived from the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study and AIDS Care Cohort to evaluate the Exposure to Survival Services study, two prospective cohorts involving people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada between 1996 and 2017. Growth mixture modeling was applied to identify distinct injection drug use trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline factors associated with each trajectory.

settingCanada.

participantsA total of 2057 participants who reported having used illicit drugs via injection in the past 6 months at the baseline visit were included in the study. The median time since first injection drug use at baseline was 14.8 years (quartile 1-quartile 3: 6.5-24.3). MEASUREMENTS: Information regarding self-reported injection drug use during the past 6 months was collected at baseline and semi-annually thereafter via interviewer-administered questionnaires.

findingsParticipants were followed for a median of 113.4 months (quartile 1-quartile 3: 63.4-161.7). Five trajectories were identified: persistent high frequency injection (507, 24.6%); high frequency injection with late decrease (374, 18.2%); gradual cessation (662, 32.2%); early cessation with late relapse (227, 11.0%); and early cessation (287, 14.0%). Factors found to be associated with distinct trajectories included: daily heroin injection, binge injection drug use, age, not being in a stable relationship and year of study enrollment.

conclusionsPeople who used drugs in Vancouver, Canada from 1996 to 2017 appeared to follow five drug use trajectories, ranging from persistent high frequency use to early cessation. Almost 25% of participants remained high-frequency injectors over the study period.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsModels, StatisticalAdultCanadaDrug UsersFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleProspective StudiesSelf ReportSubstance Abuse, IntravenousIllicit DrugsCessationgrowth mixture modelinginjection drug uselatent trajectory groupslongitudinal studiesrelapse

Identifiers

PMID31328354
PMCPMC7498269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.